Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
[lldb][TypeSystem] ForEach: Don't hold the TypeSystemMap lock across …
…callback The `TypeSystemMap::m_mutex` guards against concurrent modifications of members of `TypeSystemMap`. In particular, `m_map`. `TypeSystemMap::ForEach` iterates through the entire `m_map` calling a user-specified callback for each entry. This is all done while `m_mutex` is locked. However, there's nothing that guarantees that the callback itself won't call back into `TypeSystemMap` APIs on the same thread. This lead to double-locking `m_mutex`, which is undefined behaviour. We've seen this cause a deadlock in the swift plugin with following backtrace: ``` int main() { std::unique_ptr<int> up = std::make_unique<int>(5); volatile int val = *up; return val; } clang++ -std=c++2a -g -O1 main.cpp ./bin/lldb -o “br se -p return” -o run -o “v *up” -o “expr *up” -b ``` ``` frame llvm#4: std::lock_guard<std::mutex>::lock_guard frame llvm#5: lldb_private::TypeSystemMap::GetTypeSystemForLanguage <<<< Lock llvm#2 frame llvm#6: lldb_private::TypeSystemMap::GetTypeSystemForLanguage frame llvm#7: lldb_private::Target::GetScratchTypeSystemForLanguage ... frame llvm#26: lldb_private::SwiftASTContext::LoadLibraryUsingPaths frame llvm#27: lldb_private::SwiftASTContext::LoadModule frame llvm#30: swift::ModuleDecl::collectLinkLibraries frame llvm#31: lldb_private::SwiftASTContext::LoadModule frame llvm#34: lldb_private::SwiftASTContext::GetCompileUnitImportsImpl frame llvm#35: lldb_private::SwiftASTContext::PerformCompileUnitImports frame llvm#36: lldb_private::TypeSystemSwiftTypeRefForExpressions::GetSwiftASTContext frame llvm#37: lldb_private::TypeSystemSwiftTypeRefForExpressions::GetPersistentExpressionState frame llvm#38: lldb_private::Target::GetPersistentSymbol frame llvm#41: lldb_private::TypeSystemMap::ForEach <<<< Lock llvm#1 frame llvm#42: lldb_private::Target::GetPersistentSymbol frame llvm#43: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::FindInUserDefinedSymbols frame llvm#44: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::FindSymbol frame llvm#45: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::MemoryManager::GetSymbolAddressAndPresence frame llvm#46: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::MemoryManager::findSymbol frame llvm#47: non-virtual thunk to lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::MemoryManager::findSymbol frame llvm#48: llvm::LinkingSymbolResolver::findSymbol frame llvm#49: llvm::LegacyJITSymbolResolver::lookup frame llvm#50: llvm::RuntimeDyldImpl::resolveExternalSymbols frame llvm#51: llvm::RuntimeDyldImpl::resolveRelocations frame llvm#52: llvm::MCJIT::finalizeLoadedModules frame llvm#53: llvm::MCJIT::finalizeObject frame llvm#54: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::ReportAllocations frame llvm#55: lldb_private::IRExecutionUnit::GetRunnableInfo frame llvm#56: lldb_private::ClangExpressionParser::PrepareForExecution frame llvm#57: lldb_private::ClangUserExpression::TryParse frame llvm#58: lldb_private::ClangUserExpression::Parse ``` Our solution is to simply iterate over a local copy of `m_map`. **Testing** * Confirmed on manual reproducer (would reproduce 100% of the time before the patch) Differential Revision: https://reviews.llvm.org/D149949
- Loading branch information