Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

add the step to do demultiplex for GBS data #17

Open
7 tasks
lilei1 opened this issue Mar 28, 2016 · 3 comments
Open
7 tasks

add the step to do demultiplex for GBS data #17

lilei1 opened this issue Mar 28, 2016 · 3 comments
Assignees

Comments

@lilei1
Copy link
Collaborator

lilei1 commented Mar 28, 2016

Type of issue

  • Bug
  • [Y] Feature request

Bugs

Have you looked at the wiki?

The wiki is located here

  • Yes
  • No

Which handler are you having trouble with?

Describe your problem

What is the error message being generated?

# Put your error message here

Copy the part of the config file used by this handler

#   Shared values go here
#   Handler-specific values go here
#   Dependency definitions go here

Has anyone else been able to replicate your error?

  • Yes
  • No

Feature requests

What new thing is being added?

  • [ Y] New handler
  • Modification to handler

Describe the changes made

Isolated individual samples based on the barcodes

Where does this fit in with the existing pipeline?

Before QC evaluation

List any dependencies that will be needed for this change

fastx_toolkit/0.0.14

Do you have code for this change?

  • [ Y] Yes
  • No
@mojaveazure
Copy link
Collaborator

Hi Li, do you have your code uploaded to GitHub or Gist so I can look at it?

@lilei1
Copy link
Collaborator Author

lilei1 commented Mar 28, 2016

Hi, Paul.
This is Jeff's code
https://github.com/neyhartj/GBarleyS/blob/master/Pipeline_Scripts/run_fastx_barcode_splitter.sh
I used.
Thanks.
Best,
Li

On Mon, Mar 28, 2016 at 6:00 PM, Paul Hoffman notifications@github.com
wrote:

Hi Li, do you have your code uploaded to GitHub or Gist so I can look at
it?


You are receiving this because you authored the thread.
Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#17 (comment)

@mojaveazure
Copy link
Collaborator

mojaveazure commented Mar 29, 2016

Okay. I will look at this later.

Also, for future reference, put an X inside the checkboxes.

- [ ] Unchecked checkbox
- [x] Checked checkbox

will yield this:

  • Unchecked checkbox
  • Checked checkbox

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants