-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 256
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
BuG: Re: spike holes #598
Comments
I have replied in #594. The issue does not seem to be present in Kilosort4 probably because the new binary file functions work very differently, but if anyone finds it, feel free to reopen that issue. It also appears to affect different versions differently, i.e. it seems very strong in pykilosort, but less so in the Matlab versions. I could replicate it in the Matlab versions of KS 2.5 and 3, but not in 1 and 2. |
Hi Marius, thanks for testing the issue for all the version of KS. We are using a pipeline (https://github.com/jenniferColonell/ecephys_spike_sorting)) based on KS2.5 to do spike sorting, and all pipeline for downstream analysis are based on that. We would like to stick to KS2.5 for now. Do you have any suggestions to work around the bug (e.g. splitting batches with a small overlap)? Thank you in advance! |
Closing this one, it looks like #594 is the right place to continue this discussion. |
@runbogao The latest release version 2.5.2 should fix this issue. Would be great if you could test it and give me some feedback. |
Describe the issue:
Just making sure the issue isn't lost in kilosort4.
Issue #594 raised a serious concern regarding the data loading.
Can you confirm if this issue is present in KS4 or being investigated?
Thanks,
Shahaf
Reproduce the bug:
No response
Error message:
No response
Version information:
Linux win 10
Context for the issue:
Possible bug carried over from past versions of kilosort
Experiment information:
No response
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: