Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Summer24 test 5 #399

Open
wants to merge 22 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Summer24 test 5 #399

wants to merge 22 commits into from

Conversation

Gabriele-Clayton
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

Copy link

@clayton-staging clayton-staging bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code review not passed

This is the summary of issues introduced by this change:

Policy name Issues
Resilient 13
Secure 4
Composable 0
Automated 4
Engaging 0
Reliable 0
Intentional 22
Compliant 0

See the full report to learn more.

</value>
</processMetadataValues>
<processType>Workflow</processType>
<recordUpdates>

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Automated: Missing flow fault path

Severity

Warning

Finding

Step "evaluationType" of flow "Flow1" doesn't have a fault path to handle errors.

Why is this a problem?

Flows that interact with the Salesforce database can fail. As a best practice, all fault paths should cover by error handlers.

Help and documentation

@@ -0,0 +1,12 @@
public class ApexCdpQueryUsageExample {

public static void positive(List<Line_Item__c> items) {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Intentional: Unnecessary code

Severity

Warning

Finding

Method positive is not necessary. Consider removing it.

Why is this a problem?

Removing unnecessary code makes your app cleaner, more efficient and easier to understand.

MyFirstRestAPIClass.doDelete();

List<Account> ListAcct = [SELECT Id FROM Account WHERE Id=:acc.id];
System.assert(ListAcct.size() ==0 );

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Intentional: Test assertion without a comment

Severity

Warning

Finding

This assertion does not include any comments. Please add a comment that describes rationale of the assertion.

Why is this a problem?

Assertions let you test the behaviour of your application, increasing your confidence that your logic works as expected. Adding precise assertions to your tests is one of the most effective ways to detect and correct bugs. Using comments to describe the rationale of each assertion has the added benefit of documenting the inner working of the application logic, enhancing maintainability.

Help and documentation

</value>
</processMetadataValues>
<processType>Workflow</processType>
<recordUpdates>

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Automated: Missing flow fault path

Severity

Warning

Finding

Step "evaluationType" of flow "Flow2" doesn't have a fault path to handle errors.

Why is this a problem?

Flows that interact with the Salesforce database can fail. As a best practice, all fault paths should cover by error handlers.

Help and documentation

@@ -0,0 +1,11 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Secure: Usage of JavaScript in WebLinks

Severity

Warning

Finding

Usage of JavaScript in WebLinks

Why is this a problem?

JavaScript of any type is not allowed to run within the Salesforce.com application context. This includes JavaScript blocks within HomePageComponents, WebLinks, Custom buttons, and all other components run under the Salesforce DOM.

Help and documentation

@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Intentional: Use of Workflows and Process Builders

Severity

Error

Finding

Workflows and Process Builders are retired.

Why is this a problem?

Workflows and Process Builders are retired and it’s recommended to transition to Flows.

Help and documentation

System.assert(strId !=null );
}

static testMethod void testDeleteMethod(){

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Resilient: Test method not annotated

Severity

Warning

Finding

The test method testDeleteMethod is not annotated. Remove the testMethod keyword and annotate with @IsTest instead.

Why is this a problem?

Salesforce has deprecated the use of the testMethod keyword. Annotating test methods with @istest is the widely recommended approach.

Help and documentation

@@ -0,0 +1,607 @@
<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Secure: Flow without access restrictions

Severity

Warning

Finding

This flow doesn't define any access restriction. Permissions to run certain flows should be defined either at the profile or at the permission set level.

Why is this a problem?

As a best practice, flows should be restricted to specific users. Omitting restrictions gives all users the possibility to invoke a flow, which is typically undesirable.

Help and documentation


}

static testMethod void testPostMethod(){

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Resilient: Test method not annotated

Severity

Warning

Finding

The test method testPostMethod is not annotated. Remove the testMethod keyword and annotate with @IsTest instead.

Why is this a problem?

Salesforce has deprecated the use of the testMethod keyword. Annotating test methods with @istest is the widely recommended approach.

Help and documentation

}


public static void negative(List<Line_Item__c> items) {

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Intentional: Unnecessary code

Severity

Warning

Finding

Method negative is not necessary. Consider removing it.

Why is this a problem?

Removing unnecessary code makes your app cleaner, more efficient and easier to understand.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants