Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[pick][gql-2024.1.0] explicitly setup test scenario for test_query_default_page_limit (#18… #18395

Conversation

wlmyng
Copy link
Contributor

@wlmyng wlmyng commented Jun 25, 2024

…393)

Unblock #18277 by explicitly setting up the correct test scenario for the
test_query_default_page_limit test.

I think we can follow this up with

  1. instead of using the same db url, follow sui-graphql-e2e-tests pattern and generate unique db urls for each test
  2. this is so that we can run tests in parallel instead of sequentially (which is the case today due to the serial)
  3. we can leverage ExecutorCluster.cleanup_resources to cleanup each test

How did you test the new or updated feature?


Check each box that your changes affect. If none of the boxes relate to your changes, release notes aren't required.

For each box you select, include information after the relevant heading that describes the impact of your changes that a user might notice and any actions they must take to implement updates.

  • Protocol:
  • Nodes (Validators and Full nodes):
  • Indexer:
  • JSON-RPC:
  • GraphQL:
  • CLI:
  • Rust SDK:

Description

Describe the changes or additions included in this PR.

Test plan

How did you test the new or updated feature?


Release notes

Check each box that your changes affect. If none of the boxes relate to your changes, release notes aren't required.

For each box you select, include information after the relevant heading that describes the impact of your changes that a user might notice and any actions they must take to implement updates.

  • Protocol:
  • Nodes (Validators and Full nodes):
  • Indexer:
  • JSON-RPC:
  • GraphQL:
  • CLI:
  • Rust SDK:

)

Unblock #18277 by explicitly
setting up the correct test scenario for the
`test_query_default_page_limit` test.

I think we can follow this up with
1. instead of using the same db url, follow sui-graphql-e2e-tests
pattern and generate unique db urls for each test
2. this is so that we can run tests in parallel instead of sequentially
(which is the case today due to the serial)
3. we can leverage ExecutorCluster.cleanup_resources to cleanup each
test

How did you test the new or updated feature?

---

Check each box that your changes affect. If none of the boxes relate to
your changes, release notes aren't required.

For each box you select, include information after the relevant heading
that describes the impact of your changes that a user might notice and
any actions they must take to implement updates.

- [ ] Protocol:
- [ ] Nodes (Validators and Full nodes):
- [ ] Indexer:
- [ ] JSON-RPC:
- [ ] GraphQL:
- [ ] CLI:
- [ ] Rust SDK:
Copy link

vercel bot commented Jun 25, 2024

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎

Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
sui-docs ✅ Ready (Inspect) Visit Preview 💬 Add feedback Jun 25, 2024 1:10am
3 Ignored Deployments
Name Status Preview Comments Updated (UTC)
multisig-toolkit ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jun 25, 2024 1:10am
sui-kiosk ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jun 25, 2024 1:10am
sui-typescript-docs ⬜️ Ignored (Inspect) Visit Preview Jun 25, 2024 1:10am

@stefan-mysten
Copy link
Contributor

Just an FYI, this branch will be no longer used after this week's major release.

@wlmyng
Copy link
Contributor Author

wlmyng commented Jun 25, 2024

Just an FYI, this branch will be no longer used after this week's major release.

wooo love deprecation

@wlmyng wlmyng merged commit 246f4e4 into releases/sui-graphql-rpc-v2024.1.0-release Jun 25, 2024
42 of 43 checks passed
@wlmyng wlmyng deleted the wlmyng/gql/legacy/fix-test-query-default-page-limit branch June 25, 2024 18:39
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants