-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 159
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update global_4denvar and global_enkf ctests to reflect GFS v17 #759
Comments
@CatherineThomas-NOAA , @emilyhcliu : Any input regarding what needs to change? Whom else should we tag for input? |
@RussTreadon-NOAA : One that immediately comes to my mind is that |
@CatherineThomas-NOAA , if you have log files from a GFS v17 parallel, I can get the namelist changes from these. No need to add to your workload. |
Work for this issue will be done in |
@RussTreadon-NOAA : Here is what I saw in a quick run through of some logs, ignoring known differences in resolution/iterations deterministic (regression v g-w develop)
ensemble (regression v g-w develop)
Comments
I did not look at the obs bufrs list. I have a recent g-w test here if anyone wants to look at the namelists more closely: |
Thank you @CatherineThomas-NOAA . I'll digest your findings, look at some log files, and update global_4denvar and global_enkf namelists accordingly. |
…lign with GFS v17 (NOAA-EMC#759)
The global_4denvar (
gsi.x
) and global_enkf (enkf.x
) scripts and namelistsregression/global_4denvar.sh
regression/global_enkf.sh
regression/regression_namelists.sh
regression/regression_namelists_db.sh
should reflect how we intend to run
gsi.x
andenkf.x
in GFS v17. This issue is opened to document these changes.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: