-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 150
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix write_incr #559
Merged
RussTreadon-NOAA
merged 23 commits into
NOAA-EMC:develop
from
jderber-NOAA:fix_write_incr
Apr 14, 2023
Merged
Fix write_incr #559
Changes from 22 commits
Commits
Show all changes
23 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
b846b29
GitHub Issue NOAA-EMC/GSI#175. Use the global 127L B-Matrix in regio…
jderber-NOAA 05f1c1f
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master'
jderber-NOAA 059e402
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master'
jderber-NOAA f938842
GitHub Issue NOAA-EMC/GSI#219 Improve Minimization and fix bug in vqc
jderber-NOAA fafadac
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master'
jderber-NOAA 52c5ae6
fix setupw
jderber-NOAA f00e377
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master'
jderber-NOAA 7703367
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master'
jderber-NOAA 9eb9606
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/master'
jderber-NOAA 3eb0e13
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/develop' into develop
jderber-NOAA ddced98
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/develop' into develop
jderber-NOAA f60343b
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/develop' into develop
jderber-NOAA 8dbfbd1
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/develop' into develop
jderber-NOAA 1554f65
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/develop' into develop
jderber-NOAA bf060fd
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/develop' into develop
jderber-NOAA 3f073fa
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/develop' into develop
jderber-NOAA 7f62d1c
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/develop' into develop
jderber-NOAA 85cbdb1
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/develop' into develop
jderber-NOAA 51a444b
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/develop' into develop
jderber-NOAA 0be4126
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/develop' into develop
jderber-NOAA 57fda95
Merge remote-tracking branch 'upstream/develop' into develop
jderber-NOAA 333ec2b
Changes to write_incr for ticket # 558
jderber-NOAA 768a703
Fix issue found by Ting in review.
jderber-NOAA File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
good catch on this, no idea why this one is different from the rest... does this have any implcations for current GFSv16?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@jderber-NOAA I am a little confused here. In the following around line 313 (in this program), there is
! compute q increment sub_q = sub_qanl(:,:,:) - ges_q1(:,:,:,ibin)
So, seems to me, the original code intentionally gets analysis q in full at the above (line 205) .
I am wondering why the original treatment is used . However, if the change of line 214 is used, the following line 313 should also be changed too?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I agree good catch. I do not understand why this variable is handled differently. But the intent of this change is not to change the science, but to make the code work. The line is reverted to use gfs_bundle and the tests resubmitted.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
All regression tests passed and test of code was fine. I believe this is ready for re-review.