Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

grib1 cleanup #410

Merged
merged 22 commits into from
Nov 17, 2021
Merged

grib1 cleanup #410

merged 22 commits into from
Nov 17, 2021

Conversation

hertneky
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

@hertneky hertneky changed the title Th grib1 cleanup grib1 cleanup Oct 26, 2021
@hertneky hertneky linked an issue Oct 26, 2021 that may be closed by this pull request
2 tasks
@hertneky hertneky requested a review from WenMeng-NOAA October 26, 2021 18:12
@WenMeng-NOAA WenMeng-NOAA added the Ready for Review This PR is ready for code review. label Nov 2, 2021
@WenMeng-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

@hertneky Could you sync your branch with upstream/develop?

@hertneky
Copy link
Contributor Author

hertneky commented Nov 2, 2021

@WenMeng-NOAA Sync'd

@WenMeng-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

@hertneky The READCNTRL.F is not in the compiling list any more. Do you think it can be removed from sorc/ncep_post.fd?

@hertneky
Copy link
Contributor Author

hertneky commented Nov 2, 2021

@WenMeng-NOAA Yes, READCNTRL.F can be removed from the directory.

@WenMeng-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

@hertneky Since all grib1 settings are removed from RQSTFLD.F, do you think this file name can be changed back to RQSTFLD.f which would have consistency with most of UPP routines?

@hertneky
Copy link
Contributor Author

hertneky commented Nov 3, 2021

Yes that makes sense for consistency. Should we keep the name RQSTFLD as is? Either way I can tack on a line in the history of this revision too.

@WenMeng-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

@hertneky I might think using RQSTFLD.f would be easy for searching something during debugging. Please add your change logs in related source code files.

@WenMeng-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

@hertneky Do you have any updates on your branch?

@hertneky
Copy link
Contributor Author

hertneky commented Nov 9, 2021

@WenMeng-NOAA The additional mods had caused all runs to fail except GFS, which ran and was bit-wise identical. I had not had the time to look at exactly which change caused the failures. I can look into this now.

@hertneky
Copy link
Contributor Author

@WenMeng-NOAA Sorry for the delay. The UPP team apparently has resource issues and my jobs sat in queue much of yesterday. There were no issues with running, I just needed to update the scripts. All tests on Hera passed with additional mods.

@WenMeng-NOAA WenMeng-NOAA added No Baseline Change No baseline of the UPP regression tests are made. remove legacy Remove legacy features/capability labels Nov 15, 2021
@WenMeng-NOAA WenMeng-NOAA requested a review from fossell November 15, 2021 17:10
@WenMeng-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

@fossell Please let me know if you have more comments. Thanks!

@WenMeng-NOAA
Copy link
Collaborator

The UPP regression tests were successfully completed on WCOSS-Dell, WCOSS-Cray and Hera. No changed results were found. This PR is ready for merging.

@hertneky hertneky marked this pull request as ready for review November 15, 2021 17:14
@WenMeng-NOAA WenMeng-NOAA merged commit d903e3e into NOAA-EMC:develop Nov 17, 2021
@hertneky hertneky deleted the th_grib1_cleanup branch May 10, 2022 20:34
EricJames-NOAA pushed a commit to EricJames-NOAA/UPP that referenced this pull request Dec 14, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
No Baseline Change No baseline of the UPP regression tests are made. Ready for Review This PR is ready for code review. remove legacy Remove legacy features/capability
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Clean up remaining Grib1 files and code
2 participants