value of q_cond in atmos_cubed_sphere/model/fv_cmp.F90

[DeniseWorthen]

In atmos_cubed_sphere/model/fv_cmp.F90 the value of qpz and q_cond were changed from 1e-6 to 1e-8 at commit # c86c32c6. The value of q_cond at this line was not changed. Is this correct?

[junwang-noaa]

Ruiyu,

Would you check this issue? Thanks.

[RuiyuSun]

Jun, This is OK. I meant to change this. thanks, Ruiyu

…

On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 2:00 PM junwang-noaa ***@***.***> wrote: Ruiyu, Would you check this issue? Thanks. — You are receiving this because you were assigned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#28?email_source=notifications&email_token=AKFOCLGMNT3TN6XVMNI2RIDQ3OJERA5CNFSM4J3KC7TKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEH4SCFI#issuecomment-569975061>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKFOCLFEMROAYTBMJKHI2KLQ3OJERANCNFSM4J3KC7TA> .

-- Ruiyu Sun, PhD *IMSG* at NOAA/NWS/NCEP/EMC 5830 University Research Ct., Rm. 2097 College Park, MD 20740 Ruiyu.Sun@noaa.gov <Joe.Smith@noaa.gov> 301-683-3787

[junwang-noaa]

Ruiyu, May I ask what is the impact of this change? Will it change fv3 parallel results? Thanks. Jun

…

On Thu, Jan 2, 2020 at 8:10 AM RuiyuSun ***@***.***> wrote: Jun, This is OK. I meant to change this. thanks, Ruiyu On Tue, Dec 31, 2019 at 2:00 PM junwang-noaa ***@***.***> wrote: > Ruiyu, > > Would you check this issue? Thanks. > > — > You are receiving this because you were assigned. > Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub > < #28?email_source=notifications&email_token=AKFOCLGMNT3TN6XVMNI2RIDQ3OJERA5CNFSM4J3KC7TKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEH4SCFI#issuecomment-569975061 >, > or unsubscribe > < https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AKFOCLFEMROAYTBMJKHI2KLQ3OJERANCNFSM4J3KC7TA > > . > -- Ruiyu Sun, PhD *IMSG* at NOAA/NWS/NCEP/EMC 5830 University Research Ct., Rm. 2097 College Park, MD 20740 ***@***.*** ***@***.***> 301-683-3787 — You are receiving this because you commented. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#28?email_source=notifications&email_token=AI7D6TIKUQJTY52HKHCVIGLQ3XRVNA5CNFSM4J3KC7TKYY3PNVWWK3TUL52HS4DFVREXG43VMVBW63LNMVXHJKTDN5WW2ZLOORPWSZGOEH6JWGI#issuecomment-570202905>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AI7D6TNSVP5JT2W44J4NFWTQ3XRVNANCNFSM4J3KC7TA> .

[junwang-noaa]

Talked to Ruiyu, here is a summary. The number in the line Denise showed is a tuning number that can be tested. So far the fv3 parallel results are good with this number in the code. Further tests can be conducted to check if this qcond condition needs to be changed. In a summary, it is not an issue so far. Close ticket.