-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 36
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updates from RRFS_A v0.7.3 retro tests #93
Conversation
Set tg3_from_soil=True for make_ics.
@chan-hoo @MatthewPyle-NOAA Please review this PR. Hopefully, we can build v0.7.3 based on this PR. |
@@ -2,14 +2,6 @@ | |||
#### NEMS Run-time Configuration File ##### | |||
############################################# | |||
|
|||
# ESMF # |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@hu5970, do you have any reason for removing this part? This if-statement can keep the ufs-weather-model printing out a large number of PET* log files.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yes, this part somehow blocked OMP to use multiple threads. I do not know why but we have to live with a large number of PET* log files for now.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@chan-hoo Are you okay with it despite this little annoyance?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
No red flags for me based on a quick look. But would like to see approval from someone else as well before merging.
The current workflow is tested on Dogwood with retrospective experiments and compared with the GSL RRFS_dev1 tag 0.7.1.
Several small updates needed to match the current RRFS_A v0.7.1:
This PR addresses issue #92
The retro experiments are conducted on Dogwood and got identical results between v0.7.1 and v0.7.3 for control cycle and ensemble DA cycle in initial/boundary, GSI/EnKF analysis, nonvar cloud analysis, data process, and model forecast restart files.
Also, the wall time for each components are similar to the v0.7.1.