Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updates from RRFS_A v0.7.3 retro tests #93

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Nov 7, 2023
Merged

Updates from RRFS_A v0.7.3 retro tests #93

merged 3 commits into from
Nov 7, 2023

Conversation

hu5970
Copy link
Contributor

@hu5970 hu5970 commented Nov 7, 2023

The current workflow is tested on Dogwood with retrospective experiments and compared with the GSL RRFS_dev1 tag 0.7.1.
Several small updates needed to match the current RRFS_A v0.7.1:

  1. turn on OPM thread by updating model_configure and nems configure.
  2. set tg3_from_soil=True for make_ics
  3. update configure files for RRFS_A retro runs.
  4. changes in prep_cyc for initial Jet/Hera runs.

This PR addresses issue #92

The retro experiments are conducted on Dogwood and got identical results between v0.7.1 and v0.7.3 for control cycle and ensemble DA cycle in initial/boundary, GSI/EnKF analysis, nonvar cloud analysis, data process, and model forecast restart files.

Also, the wall time for each components are similar to the v0.7.1.

@hu5970
Copy link
Contributor Author

hu5970 commented Nov 7, 2023

@chan-hoo @MatthewPyle-NOAA Please review this PR. Hopefully, we can build v0.7.3 based on this PR.

@@ -2,14 +2,6 @@
#### NEMS Run-time Configuration File #####
#############################################

# ESMF #
Copy link
Contributor

@chan-hoo chan-hoo Nov 7, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@hu5970, do you have any reason for removing this part? This if-statement can keep the ufs-weather-model printing out a large number of PET* log files.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yes, this part somehow blocked OMP to use multiple threads. I do not know why but we have to live with a large number of PET* log files for now.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@chan-hoo Are you okay with it despite this little annoyance?

Copy link
Contributor

@MatthewPyle-NOAA MatthewPyle-NOAA left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No red flags for me based on a quick look. But would like to see approval from someone else as well before merging.

@MatthewPyle-NOAA MatthewPyle-NOAA merged commit d3bf3fd into NOAA-EMC:dev-sci Nov 7, 2023
@hu5970 hu5970 deleted the rrfsa_073 branch November 29, 2023 02:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants