-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 394
Commit
- Loading branch information
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -2037,13 +2037,13 @@ void AllocateSurfaceHeatBalArrays(EnergyPlusData &state) | |
"Average", | ||
Surface(loop).Name); | ||
if (Surface(loop).ExtBoundCond == ExternalEnvironment) { | ||
SetupOutputVariable(state, | ||
"Surface Outside Face Convection Classification Index", | ||
OutputProcessor::Unit::None, | ||
state.dataSurface->SurfOutConvClassification(loop), | ||
"Zone", | ||
"Average", | ||
Surface(loop).Name); | ||
// SetupOutputVariable(state, | ||
This comment has been minimized.
Sorry, something went wrong.
This comment has been minimized.
Sorry, something went wrong.
amirroth
Collaborator
|
||
// "Surface Outside Face Convection Classification Index", | ||
// OutputProcessor::Unit::None, | ||
// state.dataSurface->SurfOutConvClassification(loop), | ||
// "Zone", | ||
// "Average", | ||
// Surface(loop).Name); | ||
SetupOutputVariable(state, | ||
"Surface Outside Face Forced Convection Model Equation Index", | ||
OutputProcessor::Unit::None, | ||
|
5 comments
on commit c59ca83
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
conv-coeff-enums-2 (mitchute) - x86_64-Linux-Ubuntu-18.04-gcc-7.5: OK (3145 of 3146 tests passed, 694 test warnings)
Messages:\n
- 695 tests had: AUD diffs.
- 681 tests had: RDD diffs.
- 2 tests had: ERR diffs.
- 2 tests had: MTD diffs.
- 1 test had: EIO diffs.
- 1 test had: ESO small diffs.
- 1 test had: MTR small diffs.
- 1 test had: Table big diffs.
Failures:\n
regression Test Summary
- Passed: 741
- Failed: 1
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Do we have a plan for allowing enums in SetupOutputVars yet, or do we just label them as "not converted to enum due to SetupOutputVars usage," or similar? I thought there was a branch that proposed a solution on this but can't track it down.