Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix #8748 - Fix broken symlink for ParametricPreprocessor on Unix #8749

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
May 19, 2021

Conversation

jmarrec
Copy link
Contributor

@jmarrec jmarrec commented May 4, 2021

Pull request overview

Fix #8748 - Fix broken symlink for ParametricPreprocessor on Unix

Pull Request Author

Add to this list or remove from it as applicable. This is a simple templated set of guidelines.

  • Title of PR should be user-synopsis style (clearly understandable in a standalone changelog context)
  • Label the PR with at least one of: Defect, Refactoring, NewFeature, Performance, and/or DoNoPublish
  • Pull requests that impact EnergyPlus code must also include unit tests to cover enhancement or defect repair
  • Author should provide a "walkthrough" of relevant code changes using a GitHub code review comment process
  • If any diffs are expected, author must demonstrate they are justified using plots and descriptions
  • If changes fix a defect, the fix should be demonstrated in plots and descriptions
  • If any defect files are updated to a more recent version, upload new versions here or on DevSupport
  • If IDD requires transition, transition source, rules, ExpandObjects, and IDFs must be updated, and add IDDChange label
  • If structural output changes, add to output rules file and add OutputChange label
  • If adding/removing any LaTeX docs or figures, update that document's CMakeLists file dependencies

Reviewer

This will not be exhaustively relevant to every PR.

  • Perform a Code Review on GitHub
  • If branch is behind develop, merge develop and build locally to check for side effects of the merge
  • If defect, verify by running develop branch and reproducing defect, then running PR and reproducing fix
  • If feature, test running new feature, try creative ways to break it
  • CI status: all green or justified
  • Check that performance is not impacted (CI Linux results include performance check)
  • Run Unit Test(s) locally
  • Check any new function arguments for performance impacts
  • Verify IDF naming conventions and styles, memos and notes and defaults
  • If new idf included, locally check the err file and other outputs

@jmarrec jmarrec added SeverityLow This defect is low severity, generally indicating low impact with a workaround available AuxiliaryTool Related to an auxiliary tool, not EnergyPlus itself (readvars, preprocessor, ep-launch, etc.) labels May 4, 2021
@jmarrec jmarrec requested a review from Myoldmopar May 4, 2021 19:17
@jmarrec jmarrec self-assigned this May 4, 2021
@mitchute mitchute added the Defect Includes code to repair a defect in EnergyPlus label May 17, 2021
@mitchute
Copy link
Collaborator

I've confirmed the broken symlink. Once GH Actions comes back online, I'll merge develop into this branch and make a test build.

@mitchute
Copy link
Collaborator

@Myoldmopar FYI

[100%] Built target energyplus
Run CPack packaging tool...
CPack Error: Cannot find QtIFW compiler "binarycreator": likely it is not installed, or not in your PATH
CPack Error: Cannot initialize the generator IFW
Makefile:92: recipe for target 'package' failed
make: *** [package] Error 1
Error: Process completed with exit code 2.

@jmarrec
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmarrec commented May 19, 2021

@Myoldmopar FYI

[100%] Built target energyplus
Run CPack packaging tool...
CPack Error: Cannot find QtIFW compiler "binarycreator": likely it is not installed, or not in your PATH
CPack Error: Cannot initialize the generator IFW
Makefile:92: recipe for target 'package' failed
make: *** [package] Error 1
Error: Process completed with exit code 2.

See my commit e0a164e on the FileSystem branch...

Edit: Cherry picked and put in this PR: #8774. Then merged that branch here so CI could report. I re-spawned your release build by untagging and retagging at HEAD (https://github.com/NREL/EnergyPlus/releases/tag/SymLink)

@jmarrec
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmarrec commented May 19, 2021

all good for Github Actions.

image

@jmarrec
Copy link
Contributor Author

jmarrec commented May 19, 2021

I tested the Linux 18.04 .run from the GHA:

I installed it to /usr/local/EnergyPlus-9.5.0-temp. symlink works correctly

$ ls -la /usr/local/bin/Pa*
lrwxrwxrwx 1 root root 89 May 19 13:10 /usr/local/bin/ParametricPreprocessor -> /usr/local/EnergyPlus-9-5-0-temp/PreProcess/ParametricPreprocessor/ParametricPreprocessor

@mitchute
Copy link
Collaborator

I've confirmed the fix on my 18.04 VM. I'm gonna merge #8774, then immediately this PR. Thanks, @jmarrec!

@mitchute mitchute merged commit 61edffa into develop May 19, 2021
@mitchute mitchute deleted the 8748_Symlink_ParametricPreprocessor branch May 19, 2021 14:50
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
AuxiliaryTool Related to an auxiliary tool, not EnergyPlus itself (readvars, preprocessor, ep-launch, etc.) Defect Includes code to repair a defect in EnergyPlus SeverityLow This defect is low severity, generally indicating low impact with a workaround available
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Symlink to ParametricPreprocessor is broken on Unix
7 participants