Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Degradation #436

Merged
merged 9 commits into from
Jan 4, 2024
Merged

Degradation #436

merged 9 commits into from
Jan 4, 2024

Conversation

WilliamsTravis
Copy link
Collaborator

This adds the ability to get lifetime outputs, though with restrictions on which variables may be returned. Definitely open to suggestion about how best to handle the limited available lifetime outputs from SAM.

@ppinchuk
Copy link
Collaborator

Gunna have to get those tests fixed before we do much more with this I think

@WilliamsTravis
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Hi, yes definitely, got pulled away by a more pressing issue with the runs i need this for, will fix asap.

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Dec 19, 2023

Codecov Report

Attention: 4 lines in your changes are missing coverage. Please review.

Comparison is base (0bf8745) 87.02% compared to head (bc23ad1) 87.09%.

Files Patch % Lines
reV/generation/generation.py 92.10% 3 Missing ⚠️
tests/test_gen_pv.py 96.15% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #436      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   87.02%   87.09%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files         122      122              
  Lines       17047    17120      +73     
==========================================
+ Hits        14836    14911      +75     
+ Misses       2211     2209       -2     
Flag Coverage Δ
unittests 87.09% <94.87%> (+0.06%) ⬆️

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Collaborator

@ppinchuk ppinchuk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice job! A few minor requests, with special emphasis on the formatting thorughout.
Huge kudos for doing all the validation checks AND including tests. You're basically a reV developer now :)

@WilliamsTravis
Copy link
Collaborator Author

Now it is failing on docstring lines that are over the line length limit, though these were there before and it had passed. Not sure how you'd like to handle this.

@ppinchuk
Copy link
Collaborator

Ooops! Those are totally my bad. Not much to do about it though, since we need that length for the link to work (I'm pretty sure?). Anyways, I disabled the check for those docstrings

Copy link
Collaborator

@ppinchuk ppinchuk left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Nice job!

@WilliamsTravis WilliamsTravis merged commit 9b253a1 into main Jan 4, 2024
8 checks passed
github-actions bot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 4, 2024
@ppinchuk ppinchuk deleted the degradation branch January 5, 2024 19:04
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants