Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

refactor: evaluate/subst for univariate polynomials #1948

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

thofma
Copy link
Member

@thofma thofma commented Dec 25, 2024

  • rename subst to evaluate_brent_kung and add a hard alias
    for backwards compatibility
  • introduce evaluate_horner
  • use in-place operations where possible

(Ideally we can phase out subst.)

Copy link

codecov bot commented Dec 25, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 84.09091% with 7 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 88.22%. Comparing base (9843ed5) to head (9a78910).
Report is 4 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
src/Poly.jl 84.09% 7 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #1948      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   88.21%   88.22%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         119      119              
  Lines       30385    30429      +44     
==========================================
+ Hits        26803    26845      +42     
- Misses       3582     3584       +2     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

src/Poly.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/Poly.jl Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
- rename `subst` to `evaluate_brent_kung` and add a hard alias
  for backwards compatibility
- introduce `evaluate_horner`
- use in-place operations where possible
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants