Cap DotNetty Threads #7134
Merged
Cap DotNetty Threads #7134
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
LukaszRozmej
approved these changes
Jun 4, 2024
|
@asdacap can you double check? |
|
Should be fine. Saved a little memory probably. The message handling is capped to 1 thread by default anyway. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Changes
Unbounded as there are 2 loops and the default is logical cores x 2; that can easily be 128 threads for consumer regular hardware or 512 threads for a top end Thread Ripper (2x2x128)
Steam hardware report from 2019
Types of changes
What types of changes does your code introduce?
Testing
Requires testing