Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Archive: Favorite .mag files #110
Archive: Favorite .mag files #110
Changes from 1 commit
399bf71
21fe6c6
26aace2
127edd8
99d68cc
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Also reminds me about the wav player, for the previous files we added support for, we moved the applications to the firmware repository. The idea was that if one day we were to make a build without apps included, these that have file associations would be included anyway. But now I'm not so sure, on both of these things. I'm not sure if we'd actually ever have a build without apps, sounds like unnecessary complexity and confusion, and would need some rework of the webupdater. And even if we do decide to do that, I'm not sure that including the apps regardless just because they have file associations, would make sense. Could just be that if you did install one without apps, then it would give an error for the app missing...
Nothing to change here, just a discussion we'll have to go over with the team
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Hm, I wonder if we could do something clever like implement an optional
ArchiveSupportedFaps
interface, like NFC does withNfcSupportedCardsPlugin
, where one can populate the relevant stuct fields (just file icon and fap path?) and then the list gets auto-built onload of the archive. Probably out of scope, but would eliminate maintenance edits like this, and handle the above edge case you're mentioning nicely. Would leave it up to FAP authors to implement or not, and I don't think it'd cause conflicts across FWs (or if so, easy enough to just wrap in anifdef
like the other FW-specific features)