Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

eztrace: 1-1-7 -> 1.1-11, fix build, switch to fetchFromGitLab, refactor #144645

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 5, 2021

Conversation

legendofmiracles
Copy link
Contributor

@legendofmiracles legendofmiracles commented Nov 4, 2021

Motivation for this change

ZHF: #144627
https://hydra.nixos.org/build/157349557

I do realize that release tarballs are preferred over source tarballs of the release - but having to patch the resulting configure script feels unnecessary, when we can generate the makefile and configure script ourselves.

Things done
  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • Tested via one or more NixOS test(s) if existing and applicable for the change (look inside nixos/tests)
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
  • Tested execution of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 21.11 Release Notes (or backporting 21.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

license = lib.licenses.cecill-b;
maintainers = with lib.maintainers; [ ];
license = licenses.cecill-b;
maintainers = with maintainers; [ ];
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

You know what I'm going to suggest...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

That I add myself as a maintainer? I honestly don't know

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you're interested, yeah, I think it would be good to add yourself as maintainer.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not. Only doing this because of ZHF 🤷

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Fair enough 🙂 .

Copy link
Contributor

@risicle risicle left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

WFM nixos x86_64

Yup, think it's sensible grabbing the gitlab source in this case.

Copy link
Contributor

@thiagokokada thiagokokada left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 144645 run on x86_64-linux 1

1 package built:
  • eztrace

@thiagokokada thiagokokada merged commit 7673b2a into NixOS:master Nov 5, 2021
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild on Darwin 10.rebuild-linux: 1-10 10.rebuild-linux: 1
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants