anup: fix build on darwin

[r-burns]

Motivation for this change

ZHF 21.11 #144627

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review wip"
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 21.11 Release Notes (or backporting 21.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

[siraben]

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 144685 run on x86_64-darwin 1

1 package failed to build:

• anup

[r-burns]

Hmm, care to post the log? It works on my machine (TM)

[siraben]

$ nix log /nix/store/5sphysf2vj5xc79cd64cdnsk0qb6sb0j-anup-0.4.0.drv | ix
http://ix.io/3E48

[r-burns]

Hmm, IDK then. I tried some rebuilds with --check and they are reliable for me.

[risicle]

@siraben do you have the sandbox enabled on this machine? This isn't the first rust package where you've received this mysterious SIGABRT that others can't replicate.

Builds and works for me, macos 10.15

[siraben]

@risicle I'm on macOS 12.0.1, perhaps that's causing the difference?

[r-burns]

Interesting, could be the reason. I'm also on 10.15 FWIW.

[risicle]

Yup, that sounds a likely culprit

[thiagokokada]

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 144685 run on x86_64-linux 1

No-op on x86_64-linux.

[thiagokokada]

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 144685 run on x86_64-darwin 1

1 package built:

• anup

[thiagokokada]

Going to merge this since it works for at least some versions of macOS (before it didn't work in no one).

Patches to fix the build on macOS 12.0 can always be done in another PR.

Also, there is the https://discourse.nixos.org/t/nix-macos-monthly/12330 initiative, that once merged should also improve macOS situation (and maybe even fix this issue automatically?).

[thiagokokada]

@risicle I'm on macOS 12.0.1, perhaps that's causing the difference?

BTW, probably also related: #126411

[flurie]

Just adding that this built successfully for me on macOS 12.0.1.