Julia changes related to the release of 1.7.0 #148170
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
ofborg
bot
added
11.by: package-maintainer
10.rebuild-darwin: 0
10.rebuild-linux: 1-10
labels
7c6f434c
reviewed
Dec 1, 2021
| @@ -62,19 +61,11 @@ stdenv.mkDerivation rec { | |||
| ''; | |||
|
|
|||
| meta = { | |||
| description = "High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing"; | |||
| description = "High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing."; | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/stable/#var-meta-description
Don’t include a period at the end.
|
On Wed 01 Dec 2021, 7c6f434c wrote:
@7c6f434c commented on this pull request.
> @@ -62,19 +61,11 @@ stdenv.mkDerivation rec {
'';
meta = {
- description = "High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing";
+ description = "High-level, high-performance dynamic language for technical computing.";
https://nixos.org/manual/nixpkgs/stable/#var-meta-description
> Don’t include a period at the end.
Well spotted, correcting for both `julia_16-bin` and `julia_17-bin`.
|
added 4 commits
December 2, 2021 01:18
In line with the upstream announcement:
https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-v1-7-0-has-been-released-and-v1-6-is-now-lts/72336
No longer supported upstream:
https://discourse.julialang.org/t/julia-v1-7-0-has-been-released-and-v1-6-is-now-lts/72336
Thank you @7c6f434c for spotting these.
|
I wonder what are the chances that aarch64-linux will just work (say, at least build on ofborg) |
|
On Wed 01 Dec 2021, 7c6f434c wrote:
I wonder what are the chances that aarch64-linux will just work (say, at least build on ofborg)
Nearly 100% I would say, but I would either need to take the time to get my PINE64 up and running or have my PR merged for access to the community build box [1] to be able to debug. Still, I am a bit strapped for time at the moment, so I would greatly appreciate if this could be handled separately from this PR.
[1]: NixOS/aarch64-build-box#109
|
|
Well, if there is need to debug beyond checking the build outcome on OfBorg, it would not be «just» |
ghost
deleted the
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Motivation for this change
Julia 1.7.0 is the new stable and 1.6.4 the new LTS, with support for 1.0.5 being dropped. Reflect this in Nixpkgs.
Things done
sandbox = trueset innix.conf? (See Nix manual)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/)nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.shto update generated release notes