purescript: mark meta.sourceProvenance

[ghost]

Description of changes

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandbox = true set in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 22.05 Release Notes (or backporting 21.11 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • (Release notes changes) Ran nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.sh to update generated release notes
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

[ghost]

Ping...

[cdepillabout]

This LGTM, thanks.

---

@amjoseph-nixpkgs You generally need to cc the maintainers of the package, otherwise no one gets notified of this PR. I only saw it because I just happened to search for purescript for unrelated reasons.

[ghost]

You generally need to cc the maintainers of the package, otherwise no one gets notified of this PR.

Wow, thanks for letting me know. I assumed the whole reason we put github IDs in maintainers.nix was in order to make that happen automatically.=

[cdepillabout]

I assumed the whole reason we put github IDs in maintainers.nix was in order to make that happen automatically.

Yeah, normally it does happen automatically. I have no idea why it didn't happen here!