-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.4k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
ardour: 6.9 -> 7.1 #196290
ardour: 6.9 -> 7.1 #196290
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I didn't know about the release until I saw the notification for this PR.
Thanks for the happy surprise, works a charm!
I would like to keep 6.9 available for a while, both since 7.0 is less well tested (I already had a crash) and because 7.0 introduces a new file format.
Could you add an entry in all-packages.nix
for both ardour6
and ardour7
, and point ardour
to ardour7
?
@magnetophon Right, I think I've done the right thing? Let me know otherwise 😁 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you!
Oh, sorry, I just noticed it's 2 separate commits. |
9fa7bf8
to
4e0eb28
Compare
@magnetophon have squashed! |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thank you!
(Just so you're aware, I don't have the ability to merge this, so someone else will have to.) |
Me neither! :) |
Who else is looking forward to the new clip launcher feature? :-) |
I can't wait to try it out :) |
@ofborg build ardour6 |
Please use a web.archive.org link for unversioned downloads like https://web.archive.org/web/20221026200824/http://stuff.ardour.org/loops/ArdourBundledMedia.zip |
7.1 should be out tomorrow (according to paul davis) , this release is quite buggy, it might be worth skipping to 7.1 anyways. |
Thanks for the heads up @pyrotek45. I'll update this PR to point to 7.1 instead. @magnetophon and others, do we still want to keep ardour 6.9 around now that 7.1 is out? Is 7.1 considered a stable enough release to drop 6.9? |
@anoadragon453 I've been running 7.1 for a little bit and while it seems better, I think it's good to leave 6.9 in for a couple of months, so people can finish any running projects they have in 6.9 and transfer to 7.x when they are done. |
Release notes for 7.1: https://ardour.org/whatsnew.html (long-term link: https://ardour.org/news/7.1.html) Additionally create an 'ardour6' package for those that may wish to stay on a more stable release. To potentially be removed once 7.x stabilises.
Also fix a small formatting error in the import statements.
d98767f
to
69c3b46
Compare
@anoadragon453 That doesn't build for me, I get:
|
@magnetophon Mmm yes, because 69c3b46 is still included. Happy to drop it if we think we should add the bundled content in a separate PR (#196290 (comment)). |
The Ardour devs worked hard to be able to include this content, I think we should try to present the users the full version. |
Note that I'm happy to include it -- but will need some guidance on writing the nix needed to do so :) |
I just got it to install by replacing the
The media are in $out/share/media, but they do not show up in ardour yet. :/ |
69c3b46
to
6792988
Compare
To be explicit: I believe this is ready to be merged. |
@anoadragon453 For me, the bundled content does not show up in ardour. |
@magnetophon I just tried it out, it does work. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Now it works here too.
Thanks a lot for your patience and persistence @anoadragon453!
Description of changes
Release notes for 7.1: https://ardour.org/whatsnew.html (long-term link: https://ardour.org/news/7.1.html)
Note:
I retrieved the sha256 hash by setting it toI was confused between a base32 and base64 hashes. Have updated to use the""
and then taking the expected sum upon running the derivation. It doesn't match the same number of characters as the old hash though, so please double-check.hash
keyword.Things done
Tested:
Built on platform(s)
sandbox = true
set innix.conf
? (See Nix manual)nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD"
. Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/
)nixos/doc/manual/md-to-db.sh
to update generated release notes