Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

pipewire: fix cross to executable host #310814

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 20, 2024
Merged

Conversation

alyssais
Copy link
Member

ffado uses wrapQtAppsHook in nativeBuildInputs, but and wrapQtAppsHook depends on qtsvg, but buildPackages.qt5.qtsvg doesn't build when cross compiling. So even in the canExecute case, we can't do this.

Description of changes

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.05 Release Notes (or backporting 23.05 and 23.11 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

ffado uses wrapQtAppsHook in nativeBuildInputs, but and wrapQtAppsHook
depends on qtsvg, but buildPackages.qt5.qtsvg doesn't build when cross
compiling.  So even in the canExecute case, we can't do this.

Link: NixOS#269756
@alyssais alyssais added the 6.topic: cross-compilation Building packages on a different platform than they will be used on label May 11, 2024
@alyssais alyssais requested a review from K900 May 11, 2024 10:26
@ofborg ofborg bot added 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild labels May 11, 2024
Copy link
Contributor

@yu-re-ka yu-re-ka left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

TIL lib.systems.equals

@alyssais
Copy link
Member Author

Yeah it should be used instead of direct comparison, because of something weird to do with function pointers.

@wegank wegank added the 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one reputable person label May 12, 2024
@alyssais alyssais merged commit b054d17 into NixOS:master May 20, 2024
27 checks passed
@alyssais alyssais deleted the pipewire-cross branch May 20, 2024 08:34
brianmcgillion added a commit to brianmcgillion/ghaf that referenced this pull request May 31, 2024
fixed in the upstream
NixOS/nixpkgs#310814

Signed-off-by: Brian McGillion <bmg.avoin@gmail.com>
brianmcgillion added a commit to brianmcgillion/ghaf that referenced this pull request May 31, 2024
fixed in the upstream
NixOS/nixpkgs#310814

Signed-off-by: Brian McGillion <bmg.avoin@gmail.com>
brianmcgillion added a commit to tiiuae/ghaf that referenced this pull request Jun 3, 2024
fixed in the upstream
NixOS/nixpkgs#310814

Signed-off-by: Brian McGillion <bmg.avoin@gmail.com>
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
6.topic: cross-compilation Building packages on a different platform than they will be used on 10.rebuild-darwin: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild 10.rebuild-linux: 0 This PR does not cause any packages to rebuild 12.approvals: 1 This PR was reviewed and approved by one reputable person
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants