Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

getmail6: 6.19.02 -> 6.19.03 #326277

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 11, 2024
Merged

getmail6: 6.19.02 -> 6.19.03 #326277

merged 1 commit into from
Jul 11, 2024

Conversation

dotlambda
Copy link
Member

Description of changes

Diff: getmail6/getmail6@refs/tags/v6.19.02...v6.19.03

Changelog: https://github.com/getmail6/getmail6/blob/refs/tags/v6.19.03/docs/CHANGELOG

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@ofborg ofborg bot requested a review from wahjava July 11, 2024 11:02
@dotlambda dotlambda merged commit 4b522ae into NixOS:master Jul 11, 2024
29 of 31 checks passed
@dotlambda dotlambda deleted the getmail6 branch July 11, 2024 18:14
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant