Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gomanagedocker: init at 1.4 #347300

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Oct 12, 2024
Merged

gomanagedocker: init at 1.4 #347300

merged 2 commits into from
Oct 12, 2024

Conversation

genga898
Copy link
Contributor

@genga898 genga898 commented Oct 8, 2024

Things done

  • Built on platform(s)
    • x86_64-linux
    • aarch64-linux
    • x86_64-darwin
    • aarch64-darwin
  • For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
    • sandbox = relaxed
    • sandbox = true
  • Tested, as applicable:
  • Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
  • Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
  • 24.11 Release Notes (or backporting 23.11 and 24.05 Release notes)
    • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
    • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
    • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
  • Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

@genga898 genga898 changed the title Gomanagedocker gomanagedocker: init at 1.4 Oct 8, 2024
pkgs/by-name/go/gomanagedocker/package.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
maintainers/maintainer-list.nix Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
pkgs/by-name/go/gomanagedocker/package.nix Show resolved Hide resolved
SigmaSquadron

This comment was marked as resolved.

@genga898 genga898 force-pushed the gomanagedocker branch 4 times, most recently from 9f108da to b1e4ed8 Compare October 8, 2024 18:47
Copy link
Contributor

@SigmaSquadron SigmaSquadron left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Excellent work; thank you for addressing this so quickly! Here are some optional recommendations for your continued maintenance of this derivation: (for future PRs)

  1. Add the passthru.updateScript = nix-update-script { }; attribute, so @r-ryantm can reliably pick up updates to this package. The bot will create update pull requests for you, and as a maintainer, you'll be able to commit those automated updates into the repo by calling the @NixOS/nixpkgs-merge-bot.
  2. Add automated testing for the package. A low-hanging fruit is the trivial versioncheckhook, which tests that you're actually building the right version. You may also want to build a TUI package testing suite like nano's, or a full on NixOS virtual machine, as described in the manual.

Result of nixpkgs-review pr 347300 run on x86_64-linux 1

1 package built:
  • gomanagedocker

@Mic92
Copy link
Member

Mic92 commented Oct 12, 2024

If nix-update-script works without arguments, you might not need to add it to make the update work to work.

@Mic92 Mic92 merged commit ed65c2d into NixOS:master Oct 12, 2024
38 of 39 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants