iso-image: include release and system info in iso filenames again #372127
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This should hopefully fix a channel-blocking mistake i made w.r.t. to filenames of generated isoImages in #359345. Thanks @vcunat for reporting and apologies for breaking it!
While switching from isoImage.baseName to the unified image.baseName, I accidentaly dropped label and system information from the iso filename.
This fixes it by including isoImage.edition in the default baseName for all our isos. Resulting in filenames such as
nixos-minimal-25.05beta708350.1d95cb5-x86_64-linux.iso
again instead of just nixos-minimal.iso.Things done
nix.conf
? (See Nix manual)sandbox = relaxed
sandbox = true
nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD"
. Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage./result/bin/
)Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.