treewide: replace substituteAll with replaceVars (part 3)

[wolfgangwalther]

On the road again, driving #237216 forward. Continuation of #365440. Same approach: Auto-generated changes, removed all of those that would require adjustments.

The number of rebuilds is higher here, so targeting staging. But since this PR only contains changes in by-name/, it's easy to generate a build command to target the actually changed packages:

git diff-tree --no-commit-id --name-only HEAD -r | cut -d'/' -f 4 | sed -e 's/^/-A /g' | NIXPKGS_ALLOW_UNFREE=1 xargs nix-build

I ran this on a checkout of the PR, thus building all touched files. We probably need to double-check that none of the changes are behind a conditional which wouldn't be reached that way.

Edit: I tested this on the merge-base of master and staging, but there was a conflict here for one package. Thus rebased on latest staging - unfortunately, this causes about 3k builds for me now. So probably better tested by applying the changes to master first...

Things done

• Built on platform(s)
  • x86_64-linux
  • aarch64-linux
  • x86_64-darwin
  • aarch64-darwin
• For non-Linux: Is sandboxing enabled in nix.conf? (See Nix manual)
  • sandbox = relaxed
  • sandbox = true
• Tested, as applicable:
  • NixOS test(s) (look inside nixos/tests)
  • and/or package tests
  • or, for functions and "core" functionality, tests in lib/tests or pkgs/test
  • made sure NixOS tests are linked to the relevant packages
• Tested compilation of all packages that depend on this change using nix-shell -p nixpkgs-review --run "nixpkgs-review rev HEAD". Note: all changes have to be committed, also see nixpkgs-review usage
• Tested basic functionality of all binary files (usually in ./result/bin/)
• 25.05 Release Notes (or backporting 24.11 and 25.05 Release notes)
  • (Package updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is major or breaking
  • (Module updates) Added a release notes entry if the change is significant
  • (Module addition) Added a release notes entry if adding a new NixOS module
• Fits CONTRIBUTING.md.

---

Add a 👍 reaction to pull requests you find important.

[wolfgangwalther]

I was able to rebase on a merge-base between staging and master again, after the latest staging-next iteration merged, with much fewer builds. Hopefully this will not have a merge conflict again, let's see.

Some packages need manual testing, because they are not caught by the test command in the PR description:

• cmake has a darwin condition - confirmed the patch indeed builds fine there
• iniparser needs a doCheck=true override - confirmed it works.
• patchPpdFilesHook needs to test the passthrough tests - confirmed they pass.

[philiptaron]

I could have sworn I reviewed this. ✅