Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[RFC 0087] Promote aarch64-linux to Tier 1 support #87

Closed
wants to merge 16 commits into from
Closed

[RFC 0087] Promote aarch64-linux to Tier 1 support #87

Changes from 2 commits
Commits
Show all changes
16 commits
Select commit Hold shift + click to select a range
18d7ca9
Create 0087-aarch64-tier1.md
vikanezrimaya Mar 9, 2021
61c3f1a
Elaborate on wording here and there
vikanezrimaya Mar 9, 2021
8d3b512
Add a note about aarch64 builder availability
vikanezrimaya Mar 9, 2021
86a05df
Add a note about the increased cache coverage
vikanezrimaya Mar 9, 2021
1dfb043
Elaborated on a drawback of the alternative solution
vikanezrimaya Mar 9, 2021
bad5164
Add @grahamc as a co-author
vikanezrimaya Mar 9, 2021
e79da89
Notes about additional actions to be taken
vikanezrimaya Mar 9, 2021
6c46f9e
Decreased importance of the `qemu-binfmt` bits
vikanezrimaya Mar 9, 2021
bc94559
Update 0087-aarch64-tier1.md
vikanezrimaya Mar 9, 2021
6126ffa
Added a note about hydra-evaluator rewrite
vikanezrimaya Mar 9, 2021
d7f6389
Added an alternative suggestion
vikanezrimaya Mar 9, 2021
42a9774
Clarified prior art
vikanezrimaya Mar 9, 2021
9840a05
Mark capacity question as solved
vikanezrimaya Mar 10, 2021
483c402
Fixed a link
vikanezrimaya Mar 10, 2021
1f67d1f
Update 0087-aarch64-tier1.md
vikanezrimaya Aug 16, 2021
f1bb56e
Round of updates after the first meeting
vikanezrimaya Nov 20, 2021
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
72 changes: 72 additions & 0 deletions rfcs/0087-aarch64-tier1.md
View file
Open in desktop
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
@@ -0,0 +1,72 @@
---
feature: aarch64-tier1
start-date: 2021-03-09
author: Vika Shleina
co-authors: TBD
shepherd-team: TBD
shepherd-leader: TBD
related-issues: TBD
---

# Summary
[summary]: #summary

Move `aarch64-linux` from a Tier 2 platform to Tier 1, as described in [RFC 0046](/rfcs/0046-platform-support-tiers.md)

# Motivation
[motivation]: #motivation

`aarch64-linux` support in Nixpkgs and NixOS matures over time and becomes
more and more stable, and more devices appear having NixOS on ARM support.
Moving it to a Tier 1 platform will allow us to block release channels on
aarch64-related build failures, making it easier and safer for ARM users
to upgrade their systems, and will help in keeping software versions in
sync between several architectures due to `x86_64-linux` and `aarch64-linux`
builds sharing a channel.

`aarch64-linux` will benefit from increased binary cache coverage as an
additional result, saving on build times for end users.
vikanezrimaya marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

# Detailed design
[design]: #detailed-design

If this RFC is accepted, `aarch64-linux` builds will be added to stable
and unstable channels' `tested` aggregate jobs on Hydra, giving them ability
to block channel advances. Hydra will start building aarch64 packages and run
aarch64-based tests as part of stable and unstable channels, including them in
the binary cache, increasing its coverage as a result.
vikanezrimaya marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

# Examples and Interactions
[examples-and-interactions]: #examples-and-interactions

<!-- This section illustrates the detailed design. This section should clarify all
confusion the reader has from the previous sections. It is especially important
to counterbalance the desired terseness of the detailed design; if you feel
your detailed design is rudely short, consider making this section longer
instead. -->

In [nixos/release-combined.nix](https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/master/nixos/release-combined.nix)
`aarch64-linux` will be moved to `supportedSystems`, enabling NixOS tests
to block channel advances in case of failures.

(maybe something more? IDK for now)
vikanezrimaya marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

# Drawbacks
[drawbacks]: #drawbacks

Some build failures could unneccesarily delay channel advances, delaying critical updates.

# Alternatives
[alternatives]: #alternatives

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I am of the opinion a separate channel should be the first step. Show there are enough resources and commitment to keep it green for half a year to a year. If that is the case, we can upgrade it to Tier 1. I don't think generally there is enough understanding in how much day-to-day effort goes into actually keeping the channels green. At the same time, I have no idea how few breakage there is with aarch64 nowadays.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I added your suggestion to the manuscript.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The channel already blocks on aarch64-linux since late 2018 for the limited support set. So I guess we're ready to upgrade it to Tier 1 since things were kept green for half a year to a year.

It's all about having the jobs being tried to be built. Not about adding new blockers.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Might be worth specifying which channel we are talking about here. If you mean the unstable channel: it mostly works. If you mean the stable channel: It has been blocked for a few days when I opened the channel PR and probably nobody noticed yet.

Create an aarch64-focused channel that would build same things current `unstable` does, but for aarch64 only.
vikanezrimaya marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

# Unresolved questions
[unresolved]: #unresolved-questions

Do we have enough machines to handle aarch64 builds without delaying `x86_64-linux` builds?
vikanezrimaya marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved Hide resolved

# Future work
[future]: #future-work

TBA