Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Typo in discriminator example #3850

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

ralfhandl
Copy link
Contributor

Based on the proposed change to 3.1.1 in #3846 the 3.0.4 text seems to be wrong.

@ralfhandl ralfhandl requested review from a team and handrews May 24, 2024 09:42
@handrews
Copy link
Member

@ralfhandl there are several things that need backporting from PR #2618, this is only one of them- could you close this as it will be easier for me to backport if I don't have to split pieces out. I've added #2618 to #3626 (comment) so we won't forget it.

Copy link
Member

@handrews handrews left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

As noted in other comments, I'd prefer to port PRs as PRs and not individual lines.

@handrews handrews added this to the v3.0.4 milestone May 24, 2024
@ralfhandl
Copy link
Contributor Author

ralfhandl commented May 27, 2024

@handrews Don't find this typo explicitly mentioned in #3626 (comment), so why not just fix it by merging this trivial PR instead of risking it falling through the cracks?

Note: from my perspective 3.0.4 is the most relevant of the four spec versions we are currently working on.

@handrews
Copy link
Member

handrews commented Jun 4, 2024

This is now addressed on this line of the full merge resolution backport:

@handrews handrews closed this Jun 4, 2024
@ralfhandl ralfhandl deleted the discriminator-example branch June 5, 2024 07:03
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants