fix: clean up citations section + associated language

[jsstevenson]

a few possible changes -- let me know if they need to go through additional channels first:

• Citation policy page
  • Fix wording, which refers to a "Cite" section on the ontology detail page (the header is actually "Publications")
  • Add blockquote formatting -- Jekyll wasn't properly converting these to bootstrap blockquotes and the result didn't help readability
• OBO foundry papers page
  • Make formatting more consistent
• Big "list of known publications" section
  • Reformat for readability
  • Update description. When I first saw it, I assumed it was totally ad-hoc and wanted to instead generate it from publication annotations from the ontology metadata -- then I looked at the code and realized that's what was already happening. So, I thought it might be helpful to give a brief explanation of where the list comes from.
  • Move it to a separate page (it's big)
• Ontology detail page
  • add a linkable anchor to the "publications" header, so that the citation policy page can link to it directly
  • Fix bug where a blank "publications" section is shown if the publications metadata is an empty array instead of null. See eg here: http://obofoundry.org/ontology/fbcv.html
• Give the citation pages their own sidebar TOC. Previously they reused the "about" section's TOC which is a little confusing, see eg http://obofoundry.org/docs/Citation.html

other possible todo's:

• any other OBO publications to report/highlight under "Other papers about the OBO Foundry"?

[matentzn]

LGTM

[jsstevenson]

Other TODO's

• Fix navbar link to "other publications" anchor
• Citations sidebar (currently gets the personnel sidebar for some reason) <- this should probably be a whole other issue

[matentzn]

I approve the changes (lgtm), but I am requesting the following change:

• get approvals from @nlharris and @nataled

Once they have approved, I will too.

THANKS!

[nataled]

I approve, though I suggest that the phrase 'in a diversity of ways' be changed to 'in a variety of ways'.

[nlharris]

Looks good to me

[nlharris]

I agree with @nataled's suggestion to change "diversity" to "variety".

[jsstevenson]

Great! Just double checking -- is there anything that could be added under "other OBO foundry papers"?

[nlharris]

Not that I know of

[nlharris]

Can this be squashed and merged?

[jsstevenson]

@nlharris strictly speaking, the GitHub review process wants me to re-attain Nico's approval, but I think it's implicit so I'd be happy to go ahead and squash

[nlharris]

It won't allow squash & merge until the requested change has been made (? I thought it already was) and 2 people approve.

[jsstevenson]

Ah, yeah, foiled by repository rules. We'll be able to once @matentzn is able to re-review.

I think this comment was addressed.