[FIX] ruff: ignore printf-string-formatting of rule up031

[sanderlienaerts]

When not using Ruff, pre-commit prevents pyupgrade from replacing printf with str.format() (#49).

Using Ruff this rule is not being ignored. This commit modifies the Ruff configuration adding an ignore rule for UP031.

[pedrobaeza]

In which cases ruff is not used?

[sanderlienaerts]

In which cases ruff is not used?

Ruff is not being used in version < 14 or when use_ruff is set to False in Copier by the user. It is also False by default if the version is < 17.

[sbidoul]

I think we should not disable UP031.

If my memory is correct, using .format is only a risk for translatable strings, and that is caught by pylint Odoo.
And in Odoo the best pattern for translatable strings is _("aaa %s bbb %s", 1, 2), which is not handled by UP031.

In other cases, that rule is useful, because f-strings are generally more readable that printf style.

[sanderlienaerts]

If my memory is correct, using .format is only a risk for translatable strings, and that is caught by pylint Odoo. And in Odoo the best pattern for translatable strings is _("aaa %s bbb %s", 1, 2), which is not handled by UP031.

I have just tested this on the pre-commit config, confirming that this is the current working behaviour. So since formatting conventions for translatable strings are upheld, I will close the PR. Thanks for your feedback.