-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Use of RFC2119 language #35
Comments
I note that there is an update https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8174 |
I note that in the Fedora API spec we adopted only a subset of the RFC2119 keywords:
|
From what I can tell, respec gathers these automatically and updates the docs accordingly. Compare: https://github.com/fcrepo/fcrepo-specification/blob/master/index.html#L111-L117 with |
Proposal from 2018-07-18 editors' call: we will limit ourselves to the minimal subset of MAY, MUST, MUST NOT, SHOULD and SHOULD NOT. We will avoid the variations such as RECOMMENDED which has the same weight as SHOULD per rfc2119. There is no need to add anything to the spec as reSpec automagically does this for us. |
Agreed: we will limit ourselves to the minimal subset of MAY, MUST, MUST NOT, SHOULD and SHOULD NOT |
What words from rfc2119 will we use? Also need to add note and normative ref to spec.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: