Skip to content

Issues: OP-TED/eForms-SDK

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

10 Open 161 Closed
10 Open 161 Closed
Author
Filter by author
Loading
Label
Filter by label
Loading
Use alt + click/return to exclude labels
or ⇧ + click/return for logical OR
Projects
Filter by project
Loading
Milestones
Filter by milestone
Loading
Assignee
Filter by who’s assigned
Sort
Sort by
Newest Oldest Most commented Least commented Recently updated Least recently updated Best match
Most reactions
👍 👎 😄 🎉 😕 ❤️ 🚀 👀

Issues list

Vaildation fails if more than 6 digits are entered in field BT-36
#995 opened Aug 14, 2024 by GarrusMD
1
incorrect label for rule BR-BT-00738-0053 translations About labels and translations
#980 opened Jul 19, 2024 by mdewinne SDK 1.13.0
@YvesJo
5
Why is BT-630 mandatory in NTD-20/21? validation Related to notice validation.
#978 opened Jul 17, 2024 by ai-ffrankenberger SDK 1.13.0
@YvesJo
3
BT-98 is impossible in form 19 schematrons Related to the Schematron validation (/schematrons SDK folder)
#969 opened Jul 9, 2024 by rjvdhulst SDK 1.13.0
@YvesJo
1
Wrong rule texts in GR-LotResult-ReceivedSubmissions translations About labels and translations
#960 opened Jun 13, 2024 by GarrusMD SDK 1.13.0
@YvesJo
6
Faulty Group-Definitions in several Notice-Types. notice-types Related to the notice type definitions (/notice-types).
#870 opened Mar 27, 2024 by duranalp
8
A buyer can not be a service provider validation Related to notice validation.
#856 opened Mar 7, 2024 by DeanFirkelj
@YvesJo
2
"BT-60-Lot" in notice subtype 16.json seems to be located under the incorrect nodeId notice-types Related to the notice type definitions (/notice-types).
#799 opened Jan 10, 2024 by VirtualSatai
3
current validation rules only for BT-131(d) and BT-132(d) allow inconsistencies in BT-131(t)/BT-132(t) efx-toolkit Related to the EFX Toolkit Java library validation Related to notice validation.
#783 opened Dec 11, 2023 by gabrieledall
@YvesJo
8
Potential duplicate of data elements due to decomposing business terms to fields (BT-157-LotsGroup, BT-271-LotsGroup) business terms Clarifications on business terms fields Related to field metadata (/fields/fields.json)
#523 opened Jun 12, 2023 by jpmckinney
@YvesJo
5
ProTip! Find all open issues with in progress development work with linked:pr.