raster: Add library function to ask for mask presence #4402
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
To avoid asking about presence of the MASK raster, add a library function which checks for presence of the raster hiding its name in the library. This prepares way for OSGeo#2392. This also changes the message from using MASK to simply mask. I'm open to suggestion on wording of 'mask is present' versus 'mask is active' etc.
github-actions
bot
added
vector
wenzeslaus
commented
Sep 27, 2024
echoix
reviewed
Sep 27, 2024
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
nilason
approved these changes
Sep 30, 2024
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
To avoid asking about presence of the MASK raster, add a library function which checks for presence of the raster hiding its name in the library.
This prepares way for #2392.
This also changes the message from using MASK to simply mask. I'm open to suggestion on wording of 'mask is present' versus 'mask is active' etc.