Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Proposal: Add new appcmd and appcmdlistconfig tests for checking IIS servers on Windows, and fix backward compatibility typo on EntityItemFileTypeType (take 2) #122

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 30, 2021

Conversation

vanderpol
Copy link
Member

@vanderpol vanderpol commented Apr 14, 2021

Per oval team members, I'm redoing the updates from PR 109 based on the develop branch, not master, this should reduce the noise that was in the PR #109

This PR should resolve the issue in ticket #31 and add appcmd features per tickets #76 and #77

Per oval team members, I'm redoing the commits from PR 109 based on the develop branch, not master
@vanderpol
Copy link
Member Author

As I don't have permissions to request a review, @adammontville can you add @solind and @wmunyan as reviewers?

@wmunyan wmunyan requested review from wmunyan and solind April 14, 2021 19:19
@solind
Copy link

solind commented Apr 14, 2021

Thanks for doing this, @vanderpol, cursorily it looks good; I'll try and do a full review this week.

@wmunyan
Copy link
Contributor

wmunyan commented Apr 15, 2021

@vanderpol The only thing I am seeing is that in the appcmd_item you have the datatypes for parameter and result backwards (you have parameter as an oval-sc:EntityItemAnySimpleType, and the result as an oval-sc:EntityItemStringType).

Other than that, it looks good to me!

@solind
Copy link

solind commented Apr 18, 2021

Hi @vanderpol, I diffed your proposed changes against the stand-alone version I created for prototyping, and I concur with @wmunyan that the entity types are flip-flopped for parameter and result (where < denotes your version from the PR and > denotes my version):

22c31
<    <xsd:element name="parameter" type="oval-sc:EntityItemAnySimpleType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1">
---
>    <xsd:element name="parameter" type="oval-sc:EntityItemStringType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1">
27c36
<    <xsd:element name="result" type="oval-sc:EntityItemStringType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1">
---
>    <xsd:element name="result" type="oval-sc:EntityItemAnySimpleType" minOccurs="0" maxOccurs="1">
38c47

Other than that, it seems ready to go.

@vanderpol
Copy link
Member Author

Thanks for catching this! Dang copy/paste bug, and the fact that I can't use GitHub desktop on my work computer, so I can't easily diff what we have in our version control. I also have notes (on my other computer) with regards to PR process which I'll share as well, it might show up temporarily as a note on this ticket.

Fixed typo of flip/flopped EntityItemStringType vs EntityItemAnySimpleType for parameter and result.
@vanderpol
Copy link
Member Author

Update committed which should resolve the copy/paste typos flip/flop identified by @wmunyan and @solind.

@vanderpol
Copy link
Member Author

@adammontville below are some very basic notes I took while creating a PR, and getting it to the point of being reviewed by others.

OVAL schema update notes for github

  1. Download and install GitHub Desktop
  2. Checkout the OVAL repository in Github Desktop
  3. Select the branch of 'origin/develop' (do not select master)
  4. Make your edits using your editor of choice
  5. Diff your changes
  6. Commit to your local branch, making a useful comments.
  7. Push to origin
  8. Create a pull request, name it: "Proposal: <whatever it is you want to add/fix>
  9. In PR conversation link any tickets (using #) that this PR is intended to resolve. Example: This fixes the issue reported in ticket Updated doc guideline development instructions #1 and adds a feature that does per ticket Community Organization text and page reference anchors #2 etc...
  10. If it's ready for a peer review, request it from @adammontville

Copy link
Contributor

@wmunyan wmunyan left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good to me!

Copy link

@solind solind left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looks good.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
3 participants