Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add a way to demonstrate insufficient logging and monitoring vulnerabilities in crAPI (ISSUE 123) #137

Closed
wants to merge 4 commits into from

Conversation

drraghavendra
Copy link

Description

Please include a summary of the change, motivation and context.

ISSUE 123 Add a way to demonstrate insufficient logging and monitoring vulnerabilities in crAPI

Monitoring for crAPI
Add a way to demonstrate insufficient logging and monitoring vulnerabilities in crAPI OWASP#123
Add a way to demonstrate insufficient logging and monitoring vulnerabilities in crAPI
@drraghavendra drraghavendra changed the title ISSUE 123 Add a way to demonstrate insufficient logging and monitoring vulnerabilities in crAPI Add a way to demonstrate insufficient logging and monitoring vulnerabilities in crAPI (ISSUE 123) Oct 9, 2022
@drraghavendra
Copy link
Author

drraghavendra commented Oct 9, 2022

Consider the Log monioring.docx file only for this Pull Request @piyushroshan @JBAhire

@drraghavendra
Copy link
Author

drraghavendra commented Oct 9, 2022

Log monitoring can be split up into three parts:

1)Log collection:  this includes log enrichment like parsing of logs, converting of logs, filtering of logs, etc.
2)Log management: keeping data retention policies, keeping shards/indexes for better performance, implementing access control as logs contain sensitive in formation, etc.
3)Log monitoring/analysis: visualization, alerting, reporting.

Log Monitoring and Vulnerabilities

@JBAhire
Copy link
Collaborator

JBAhire commented Oct 9, 2022

@drraghavendra , can you please check in deployments manifests in separate subdirectory inside deployment directory instead of checking in zip files. Zip files are hard to review and consume.

Copy link
Author

@drraghavendra drraghavendra left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

please see the tick marked in checkbox document only.

@JBAhire
Copy link
Collaborator

JBAhire commented Oct 9, 2022

@drraghavendra , can you please explain the changes ones? I see 3 files: deployments zip, grafana prometheus zip, and a monitoring doc.

Can you please unzip the deployment and grafana Prometheus files and check them in the repository?

And how are you demoing insufficient logging vulnerability with current changes?

@piyushroshan , can you also check this one?

@piyushroshan
Copy link
Collaborator

Closing this since it doesn't match contribution guidelines and has no activity since last review

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants