Add missing ApproxEq implementations #52
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
It's also missing for |
|
Also equality.rs line 44, missing hue Should be |
|
Thanks, I'll add that one too. |
|
There we go. |
|
☔ The latest upstream changes (presumably #53) made this pull request unmergeable. Please resolve the merge conflicts. |
Ogeon
force-pushed
the
missing_approx_eq
branch
from
6fda7b2
to
d8ec3be
Compare
|
@homu r+ |
|
📌 Commit d8ec3be has been approved by |
|
⚡ Test exempted - status |
homu
added a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 15, 2016
Add missing ApproxEq implementations #51 didn't implement `ApproxEq` for `Alpha` and `Color`, so this PR adds those implementations.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
#51 didn't implement
ApproxEqforAlphaandColor, so this PR adds those implementations.