Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Format binary output as hex #1653

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Oct 24, 2024
Merged

Format binary output as hex #1653

merged 1 commit into from
Oct 24, 2024

Conversation

jmthomas
Copy link
Member

closes #1452

@jmthomas jmthomas requested a review from ryanmelt October 21, 2024 19:47
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 21, 2024

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 4 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 76.41%. Comparing base (6c85e08) to head (39ea961).
Report is 19 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
...xtractor/src/tools/DataExtractor/DataExtractor.vue 0.00% 4 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main    #1653      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   76.40%   76.41%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files         618      618              
  Lines       46858    46861       +3     
  Branches      845      845              
==========================================
+ Hits        35803    35810       +7     
+ Misses      10959    10955       -4     
  Partials       96       96              
Flag Coverage Δ
frontend 56.11% <0.00%> (-0.02%) ⬇️
python 83.90% <ø> (+0.04%) ⬆️
ruby-api 47.59% <ø> (ø)
ruby-backend 82.53% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

@ryanmelt ryanmelt merged commit 904875b into main Oct 24, 2024
27 checks passed
@ryanmelt ryanmelt deleted the de_binary branch October 24, 2024 02:32
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Data Extractor does not capture BLOCK in a useful manner
2 participants