First version: PSF grant report (#11)

* First version

* adding suggestion

scicookie/psf-grant-report-2024-01.md

@@ -1,19 +1,17 @@
 # Python Software Foundation (PSF) Grant report: SciCookie
 
-In January 2024 the PSF approved a new grant for SciCookie, the proposal was
-submitted at the end of December 2023 and will be implemented between February
-and April 2024\*, during which time we have been carrying out the following
-tasks:
-
-- Improve the documentation: to make it clearer, more complete and more
-  accessible to new users.
-- Improve configuration aspects: to facilitate the installation and use of
-  SciCookie.
-- Incorporate and/or update libraries and other tools: to extend the
-  functionalities.
-- Improve file structure: to make the code more organized and easier to
-  maintain.
-- Apply for pyOpenSci peer review: to obtain quality certification of the
+In January 2024, the PSF approved a new grant for SciCookie. The proposal was
+submitted at the end of December 2023 and is scheduled for implementation
+between February and April 2024\*. During this period, we have undertaken the
+following tasks:
+
+- Documentation Improvement: Enhancing clarity, completeness, and accessibility
+  for new users.
+- Configuration Enhancement: Simplifying SciCookie installation and usage.
+- Library Integration and Updates: Expanding functionalities through new
+  libraries and tools.
+- File Structure Refinement: Organizing code for improved maintenance.
+- pyOpenSci Peer Review Application: Pursuing quality certification for the
   tool.\*\*
 
 Below are the responses to the event report submitted to PSF.
@@ -30,53 +28,125 @@ Below are the responses to the event report submitted to PSF.
   _Tell us when your event happened. If the event is over multiple days, tell us
   what happened on each day._
 
+  Feb 6, 2024 to June 21, 2024.
+
 - Sessions:
 
   _Please include the number and type of sessions. Give us a feel of what was
   presented to the attendees._
 
+  Type: Weekly Development Sessions
+
+  Participants worked on assigned issues in SciCookie and shared their progress
+  each week. This allowed constant monitoring of activities and the detection of
+  any blockages.
+
 - Venue
 
   _Please describe the location. Was there something good or bad about it?_
 
+  The activity was conducted remotely
+
 - Attendees
 
   _Please include the numbers and their breakdown of gender, experience level,
   and origin._
 
+  Not applicable (There weren't formal presentations in this case)
+
 - Speakers/Coaches _Please include the number and their breakdown of gender and
   experience level_
 
+  Not applicable (There weren't formal presentations in this case)
+
 - Staff \_Please include the number, position, and their breakdown of gender and
   experience level. Was the staff paid? If so, who paid them?
 
+  Not applicable (There weren't formal presentations in this case)
+
 - Sponsors _How many sponsors did you have? Please list them and their
   sponsorship level._
 
+  Not applicable (There weren't formal presentations in this case)
+
 - Budget: Income _Please include breakdown ticket Sales vs. other Sponsors vs.
   PSF funds_
 
+  Not applicable (There weren't formal presentations in this case)
+
 - Budget: Spending _Please include the breakdown of all expenses such as swag,
   venue, food, surplus if any and where the surplus went._
 
+  Not applicable (There weren't formal presentations in this case)
+
 - If you would like to share a quote about what the PSF grant means to your
   organization (that can be used for marketing purposes), please enter it below.
 
+  The PSF grant has catalyzed a significant transformation of the SciCookie
+  tool, enabling improvements in configuration, user customization, and overall
+  maintenance.
+
+  This impact extends beyond the tool itself to community members, enhancing
+  their skills in various areas:
+
+  - Project Management: The SciCookie project has equipped community members
+    with valuable experience in project implementation and organization.
+
+  - Problem-Solving: Participants honed their skills in systematic
+    troubleshooting throughout the development process.
+  - Innovative Thinking: Finding creative solutions to technical challenges has
+    fostered a culture of exploring alternatives effectively.
+  - Collaborative Communication: The project's collaborative nature has promoted
+    open communication, encouraging participants to ask questions, share ideas,
+    and propose solutions.
+  - Promotion of Python: Contributing to SciCookie has deepened community
+    members' knowledge of Python, potentially promoting its use in scientific
+    contexts.
+
+  Open Science Labs expresses gratitude to the PSF for their grant, which has
+  significantly supported the development of SciCookie and contributed to the
+  professional and technical growth of our community.
+
 - Photos & Photographer Credit _Please link any photos you have of the event. If
   the photos are not online please send in email. If available, please share who
   should be credited for the photos._
 
 - May the PSF share your photos in communications or marketing materials? (For
   example, on our social media, on our blog, in our Annual Impact Report, or in
-  newsletters.) -[] Yes -[] No -[] Please contact us before using photos.
+  newsletters.)
+
+  -[] Yes
+
+  -[] No
 
-- Participants _Talk about the participants. Did anyone stand out?_
+  -[] Please contact us before using photos.
 
-- Participant Feedback _Did the people that attend have anything to say_
+- Participants \_Talk about the participants.
+
+  _Did anyone stand out?_
+
+  In general, Anavelyz and Yurely were in charge of resolving the issues. Ever
+  Vino was in charge of coordinating the timing and checking any blockages
+  during the execution of the project, he also helped the participants with some
+  of their doubts. Ivan Ogasawara was the one responsible for reviewing and
+  approving the issues, as well as the suggestions and the path of wisdom.
+
+- Participant Feedback _Did the people that attend have anything to say_ Thanks
+  to PSF for the grant we received, it has allowed us to acquire new knowledge
+  and in turn contribute by learning, it has given us the impetus and
+  encouragement to share our knowledge and improve every day.
 
 - Retrospective _Discuss what worked out well and what you would change for the
   next time if there is anything planned._
 
+  We are pleased to report an 80% success rate in implementing the grant. This
+  opportunity has been invaluable in addressing identified areas for improvement
+  within SciCookie, resulting in substantial progress.
+
+  However, we encountered a challenge with the absence of a peer review process
+  from PyOpenSci for tools like SciCookie. We are actively collaborating with
+  them to explore establishing a review standard in the near future.
+
 - General Feedback _Anything else you want to say that didn't fit in anywhere
   else?_