Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Updating with information submitted #13

Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
47 changes: 29 additions & 18 deletions scicookie/psf-grant-report-2024-01.md
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -28,7 +28,7 @@ Below are the responses to the event report submitted to PSF.
_Tell us when your event happened. If the event is over multiple days, tell us
what happened on each day._

Feb 6, 2024 to June 21, 2024.
Feb 6, 2024 to June 31, 2024.

- Sessions:

Expand All @@ -45,39 +45,52 @@ Below are the responses to the event report submitted to PSF.

_Please describe the location. Was there something good or bad about it?_

The activity was conducted remotely
The activity was conducted remotely.

- Attendees

_Please include the numbers and their breakdown of gender, experience level,
and origin._

Not applicable (There weren't formal presentations in this case)
Not applicable (There weren't formal presentations in this case).

- Speakers/Coaches _Please include the number and their breakdown of gender and
experience level_

Not applicable (There weren't formal presentations in this case)
Not applicable (There weren't formal presentations in this case).

- Staff \_Please include the number, position, and their breakdown of gender and
experience level. Was the staff paid? If so, who paid them?

Not applicable (There weren't formal presentations in this case)
Four people were directly involved in the project, two women and two men, all
of whom were paid from the budget money.

The payment has been given through Ivan Ogasawara, who has received the
project funds.

Main Developers: Anavelyz Perez (Female) and Yurely Camacho (Female) with
junior software developer level.

Project Manager: Ever Vino (Male); with mid-level experience in software
development.

Tech leader and reviewer: Ivan Ogasawara (Male); with senior-level experience
in software development.

- Sponsors _How many sponsors did you have? Please list them and their
sponsorship level._

Not applicable (There weren't formal presentations in this case)
In this case we have no other sponsor involved.

- Budget: Income _Please include breakdown ticket Sales vs. other Sponsors vs.
PSF funds_

Not applicable (There weren't formal presentations in this case)
Income only from PSF.

- Budget: Spending _Please include the breakdown of all expenses such as swag,
venue, food, surplus if any and where the surplus went._

Not applicable (There weren't formal presentations in this case)
Spending only associated to staff.

- If you would like to share a quote about what the PSF grant means to your
organization (that can be used for marketing purposes), please enter it below.
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -125,17 +138,11 @@ Below are the responses to the event report submitted to PSF.

_Did anyone stand out?_

In general, Anavelyz and Yurely were in charge of resolving the issues. Ever
Vino was in charge of coordinating the timing and checking any blockages
during the execution of the project, he also helped the participants with some
of their doubts. Ivan was responsible for improving the SciCookie structure,
which helped a lot to solve the issues, he was also in charge of reviewing and
approving the issues.
Not applicable (There weren't formal presentations in this case)

- Participant Feedback _Did the people that attend have anything to say_ Thanks
to PSF for the grant we received, it has allowed us to acquire new knowledge
and in turn contribute by learning, it has given us the impetus and
encouragement to share our knowledge and improve every day.
- Participant Feedback _Did the people that attend have anything to say_.

Not applicable (There weren't formal presentations in this case)

- Retrospective _Discuss what worked out well and what you would change for the
next time if there is anything planned._
Expand All @@ -160,6 +167,10 @@ Below are the responses to the event report submitted to PSF.
- General Feedback _Anything else you want to say that didn't fit in anywhere
else?_

Thanks to PSF for the grant we received, it has allowed us to acquire new
knowledge and in turn contribute by learning, it has given us the impetus and
encouragement to share our knowledge and improve every day.

[*] This time was extended because the activities required study time from the
participants.

Expand Down