feat: update gha workflows #25
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes involve updates to various GitHub Actions workflows, including renaming workflows for clarity, modifying trigger conditions, and altering job configurations to reference a new repository. Parameters have been added or adjusted across several workflows to enhance functionality. Additionally, metadata in a skill configuration file has been updated to reflect new ownership and repository information. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant Developer
participant GitHub
participant Workflow
participant Repository
Developer->>GitHub: Push changes
GitHub->>Workflow: Trigger workflow
Workflow->>Repository: Run tests and updates
Repository-->>Workflow: Return results
Workflow->>GitHub: Update status
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (7)
- .github/workflows/license_tests.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/propose_release.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/publish_alpha.yml (2 hunks)
- .github/workflows/publish_release.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/skill_tests.yml (1 hunks)
- .github/workflows/update_skill_json.yml (1 hunks)
- skill.json (2 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (2)
- .github/workflows/publish_release.yml
- .github/workflows/update_skill_json.yml
Additional comments not posted (19)
.github/workflows/license_tests.yml (3)
1-1: LGTM!The updated workflow name "Run License Tests" is more descriptive and clearly conveys the purpose of the workflow.
3-7: LGTM!The updated trigger conditions are more comprehensive and ensure that the workflow runs on both direct pushes and pull requests to the
masterbranch.
9-10: Verify the impact of theusesdirective change.The
usesdirective has been updated to reference a different repository (neongeckocom/.github) and branch (master). This change suggests a move towards a more centralized or updated repository for managing license tests.Please ensure that the referenced repository and branch contain the necessary workflow files and actions to run the license tests effectively.
Run the following script to verify the existence of the referenced workflow file:
Verification successful
Verification successful: The
usesdirective change is valid.The
license_tests.ymlfile exists in theneongeckocom/.githubrepository on themasterbranch, confirming that the workflow is pointing to a valid resource. Ensure that the contents of this file are correctly configured for the intended license tests.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the existence of the referenced workflow file. # Test: Check if the referenced workflow file exists in the `neongeckocom/.github` repository. Expect: The file to exist. gh api -H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" /repos/neongeckocom/.github/contents/.github/workflows/license_tests.ymlLength of output: 3515
.github/workflows/publish_alpha.yml (4)
3-3: LGTM!The workflow name change improves clarity by specifying that the workflow is for publishing alpha releases.
22-23: Verify the job configuration changes.Ensure that:
- The job name change aligns with the updated workflow name and purpose.
- The change in the referenced repository is intentional and the new workflow file exists.
Run the following script to verify the job configuration changes:
Verification successful
Job configuration changes verified successfully.
The job name change and the reference to the new workflow file in the
neongeckocom/.githubrepository are correct and intentional. Thepublish_alpha_release.ymlfile exists and is accessible. No issues found.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the job configuration changes. # Test: Search for the new workflow file in the referenced repository. # Expect: Workflow file exists. gh api \ --method GET \ -H "Accept: application/vnd.github+json" \ /repos/neongeckocom/.github/contents/.github/workflows/publish_alpha_release.ymlLength of output: 9436
16-16: Verify the impact of the trigger condition changes.Ensure that:
- Changes to
skill.jsondo not trigger the workflow.- Changes to files in the
examplesdirectory trigger the workflow as expected.Run the following script to verify the trigger conditions:
Verification successful
Verification of Trigger Condition Changes
The changes to the trigger conditions in the workflow are correctly implemented. The inclusion of
skill.jsoninpaths-ignoreensures that changes to this file do not trigger the workflow. The removal of the exclusion forexamples/**has no effect since theexamplesdirectory does not exist in the repository.
skill.jsonis correctly ignored.examplesdirectory is absent, so its removal frompaths-ignorehas no impact.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the impact of the trigger condition changes. # Test 1: Search for the `skill.json` file. Expect: File exists. fd skill.json # Test 2: Search for the `examples` directory. Expect: Directory exists. fd examples -t dLength of output: 45
27-33: Verify the parameter changes.Ensure that:
- The
version_fileparameter points to the correct file that contains the version information.- The new parameters are used correctly in the referenced workflow file.
Run the following script to verify the parameter changes:
.github/workflows/skill_tests.yml (4)
3-3: LGTM!The new workflow name "Test Skill" is more descriptive and clearly conveys the purpose of the workflow.
10-10: Verify the reason for the repository change.The
py_build_testsjob now uses a workflow from theneongeckocomrepository instead ofopenvoiceos. Can you please provide some context on the reason for this change? Is it related to a new organizational structure or repository management strategy?
12-15: LGTM!The changes to the
skill_unit_testsjob look good:
- The job now uses a workflow from the
neongeckocomrepository, aligning with the changes made to other jobs in the workflow.- The expanded Python version range (
neon_versionsandovos_versions) enhances the compatibility checks for the skill.
16-22: Clarify thetest_padaciosoandtest_padatiousparameters.The addition of the new
skill_intent_testsjob looks good as it expands the testing capabilities to include intent-related tests and aligns with the repository changes made to other jobs in the workflow.However, can you please provide some clarification on the
test_padaciosoandtest_padatiousparameters? What do these parameters control, and why istest_padaciososet tofalsewhiletest_padatiousis set totrue?.github/workflows/propose_release.yml (5)
1-1: LGTM!The workflow name change from "Propose Stable Build" to "Propose Stable Release" accurately reflects the shift in focus from building to releasing.
7-11: LGTM!The changes to the
release_typeinput options, including the removal of the "patch" option and the introduction of the "build" option, are approved. These changes appropriately modify the semantics of the release types available for selection.
13-23: LGTM!The
update_versionjob is a well-structured replacement for the previousbuild_and_publishjob. By utilizing a dedicated repository (neongeckocom/.github) and providing granular control over version variables and changelog updates, it enhances the workflow's version management capabilities. The job's configuration, including the specified parameters and thedevbranch operation, is approved.
25-32: LGTM!The introduction of the
pull_changesjob is a valuable addition to the workflow. By establishing a clear dependency on theupdate_versionjob and handling pull request creation with parameters for assignee, draft status, title, and body, it enhances the workflow's control flow and ensures systematic pull request management. The job's configuration and its utilization of the outputs from theupdate_versionjob are approved.
1-32: Excellent work!The overall changes to the workflow are well-structured and contribute significantly to the improvement of the release process. The modifications, including the renaming of the workflow, the alteration of job configurations, and the introduction of the
update_versionandpull_changesjobs, enhance clarity, functionality, and systematic handling of version updates and pull requests. The workflow's design and implementation are approved.skill.json (3)
3-3: LGTM!The change to the
urlfield is approved. The new URL points to the correct repository under the new ownership.
51-51: LGTM!The change to the
skillnamefield is approved. The new skill name follows the naming convention and reflects the rebranding.
52-52: LGTM!The change to the
authornamefield is approved. The new author name matches the GitHub username and reflects the new ownership.
Preparation for stable releases
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Chores