ERC721Deed #747
Closed
ERC721Deed #747
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Thanks for the PR @nastassiasachs, but we understand there was no consensus around the rename to deed. I'm closing this issue now, and the full implementation for ERC721 is continuing in #803. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Fixes #627 Implement ERC standard
🚀 Description
Recently deed has been introduced as a term to refer to non-fungible tokens (see ethereum/EIPs#841). This is an attempt at implementing the current state of the ERC721 interface.
(Sorry, I don't know why the Bounty contract tests failed on my end.)
npm run lint:all:fix).