Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed areEqualOutcomes name/displayName comparison in workflow-editor.ts #17255

Merged

Conversation

Habbni
Copy link
Contributor

@Habbni Habbni commented Dec 17, 2024

There is a little typo/mistake in workflow-editor.ts which causes the function to always return true if name differs from displayName, even if nothing has been changed. straightforward fix to this simple issue.

Copy link
Contributor

Thank you for submitting your first pull request, awesome! 🚀 If you haven't already, please take a moment to review our contribution guide. This guide provides helpful information to ensure your contribution aligns with our standards. A core team member will review your pull request.

@Habbni
Copy link
Contributor Author

Habbni commented Dec 17, 2024

@dotnet-policy-service agree

@sebastienros
Copy link
Member

You need to run the gulp command to generate the final assets in wwwroot

@Habbni
Copy link
Contributor Author

Habbni commented Dec 18, 2024

You need to run the gulp command to generate the final assets in wwwroot

ah, my bad. done

@sebastienros sebastienros enabled auto-merge (squash) December 18, 2024 00:45
@sebastienros sebastienros merged commit 21ab7d7 into OrchardCMS:main Dec 18, 2024
6 checks passed
Copy link
Contributor

Congratulations on your first PR merge! 🎉 Thank you for your contribution! We're looking forward to welcoming other contributions of yours in the future. @all-contributors please add @Habbni for code.

Copy link
Contributor

@github-actions[bot]

I've put up a pull request to add @Habbni! 🎉

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants