-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 59
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Integrate energy measurements #1863
Conversation
Note It appears that this Pull Request modifies the On inspection, the No further action is required. |
Eco-CI Output:
🌳 CO2 Data: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks! Looking forward in seeing this new indicator evolve.
There's something quite frustrating in that we live and work in one of the less CO2-intensive grid and, yet, this CI sometimes runs in like Chicago which has a 10x more polluting electricity...
I was mentioning this to @tlogan2000, that this might help justify looking into having our own dedicate GitHub (or GitLab?) test runners. If the upkeep costs are minimal, I imagine this would really reduce our footprint. |
Pull Request Checklist:
number
) and pull request (:pull:number
) has been addedWhat kind of change does this PR introduce?
pytest
teardown race conditionDoes this PR introduce a breaking change?
No.
Other information:
https://github.com/green-coding-solutions/eco-ci-energy-estimation