Zork source code #800
Merged
Zork source code #800
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Sorry, it appears I diffed the wrong way. Supnik's version is from 1981, the other one from 1979. |
larsbrinkhoff
force-pushed
the
lars/zork
branch
from
913c3f6 to
81c3b9b
Compare
larsbrinkhoff
force-pushed
the
lars/zork
branch
from
81c3b9b to
bbb8939
Compare
|
I renamed Supnik's 1981 files (which all have a .mud file extension) to match the ones from 1979. I bumped the edited file version number by one which is probably historically incorrect, but better than having them unchanged. |
|
Hello @archivisth, This is the pull request where I added the two Zork versions. The last commit will show the differences. |
|
A runnable January 1978 binary was installed in #1951 |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
I think the Zork source code is interesting even though there's no way to run it yet. (See #665.)
Also, we have a version that is a slight update over the "latest version" published by Bob Supnik.
Does anyone think it would be a bad idea to just make a ZORK directory with the source files?