Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add Holybro Pixhawk Pi CM4 Baseboard Support #20086
Add Holybro Pixhawk Pi CM4 Baseboard Support #20086
Changes from all commits
6991b85
ba8ee7e
bca7242
d706b40
9477590
bddc00b
747fd0a
f632cf7
8e3efdf
e94f355
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
There are no files selected for viewing
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@dagar let me know if this looks sane.
I could reduce flash by about 3000 bytes by using uint8_t for
power_enable_gpio
as well as thespi_drdy_gpio_t
, andcs_gpio
but stuff stopped working, so that probably went too far.I also wonder whether we should set
SPI_BUS_MAX_DEVICES
based on the actual configuration somehow to reduce the footprint of this.Also, some of the SPI configurations are completely identical but given the data structure and
constexpr
generation we have to duplicate it. Any idea how to work around that?