Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix events day-view #2087

Merged

Conversation

Ratul-Saha-003
Copy link

@Ratul-Saha-003 Ratul-Saha-003 commented Jul 14, 2024

What kind of change does this PR introduce?
bugfix

Issue Number:

Fixes #1913

Did you add tests for your changes?
No, not required

Snapshots/Videos:
After:
Screenshot from 2024-07-14 19-27-49
Before:
Screenshot from 2024-07-14 19-28-11

If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Not relevant

Summary
Events were not visible in day view due to incorrect conditional rendering in a filter function.

Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No

Other information
None

Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Bug Fixes
    • Improved accuracy and consistency in calendar event time comparisons.

Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Jul 14, 2024

Walkthrough

The recent changes involve enhancing the EventCalendar component by switching from string comparisons of time to integer comparisons. This change aims to improve accuracy and consistency, specifically addressing the issue where newly created events were not visible in the Day view, even though they appeared in the monthly view.

Changes

Files Change Summary
src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.tsx Converted time string comparisons to integer comparisons for better accuracy.

Sequence Diagram(s)

N/A

Assessment against linked issues

Objective (Issue #1913) Addressed Explanation
Newly created events must be visible in the Day view
All tests for the fix must be valid and comprehensive
Ensure the fix is applied to events created by all users

Poem

🐇 In the calendar's gentle sway,
Events now dance in the light of day,
No more hiding, all can see,
The times aligned with clarity.
With code now tuned and errors swept,
Our dates and times are well-kept. 🗓✨


Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

Share
Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table.
    • @coderabbitai show all the console.log statements in this repository.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Additionally, you can add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.

CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

  • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
  • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
  • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

Our Pull Request Approval Process

We have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team.

Testing Your Code

Please make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:

  1. The overall code coverage drops below the target threshold of the repository
  2. Any file in the pull request has code coverage levels below the repository threshold
  3. Merge conflicts

The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing.

Reviewers

Do not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
When your PR has been assigned reviewers contact them to get your code reviewed and approved via:

  1. comments in this PR or
  2. our slack channel

Reviewing Your Code

Your reviewer(s) will have the following roles:

  1. arbitrators of future discussions with other contributors about the validity of your changes
  2. point of contact for evaluating the validity of your work
  3. person who verifies matching issues by others that should be closed.
  4. person who gives general guidance in fixing your tests

CONTRIBUTING.md

Read our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:

  1. PRs with issues not assigned to you will be closed by the reviewer
  2. Fix the first comment in the PR so that each issue listed automatically closes

Other

  1. 🎯 Please be considerate of our volunteers' time. Contacting the person who assigned the reviewers is not advised unless they ask for your input. Do not @ the person who did the assignment otherwise.
  2. Read the CONTRIBUTING.md file make

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

Commits

Files that changed from the base of the PR and between 836b534 and 81961d3.

Files selected for processing (1)
  • src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.tsx (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.tsx (1)

321-322: LGTM! Verify the correctness of integer conversion.

The changes convert the time comparison from string to integer, which should enhance accuracy.

However, ensure that the integer conversion is correct and does not introduce any edge cases.

Verification successful

Verification of integer conversion and comparison logic

The usage of parseInt to extract the hour part of the time string and compare it with the modulo of index is correct. Ensure that datas.startTime is always a valid string with at least two characters to avoid potential issues.

  • Code snippet:
    if (
      parseInt(datas.startTime?.slice(0, 2) as string).toString() ==
        (index % 24).toString() &&
      datas.startDate == dayjs(currDate).format('YYYY-MM-DD')
    ) {
      return datas;
    }
Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correctness of integer conversion in time comparison.

# Test: Search for the usage of the `parseInt` function. Expect: Proper usage without edge cases.
rg --type js 'parseInt'

Length of output: 23


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Verify the correctness of integer conversion in time comparison within the specific file and lines.

# Test: Search for the usage of the `parseInt` function within the specified file and include surrounding lines for context.
rg --type js 'parseInt' -A 5 -B 5 src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.tsx

Length of output: 456

Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 14, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 97.91%. Comparing base (836b534) to head (81961d3).
Report is 8 commits behind head on develop.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff            @@
##           develop    #2087   +/-   ##
========================================
  Coverage    97.91%   97.91%           
========================================
  Files          231      231           
  Lines         6201     6201           
  Branches      1790     1783    -7     
========================================
  Hits          6072     6072           
  Misses         118      118           
  Partials        11       11           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link

This pull request did not get any activity in the past 10 days and will be closed in 180 days if no update occurs. Please verify it has no conflicts with the develop branch and rebase if needed. Mention it now if you need help or give permission to other people to finish your work.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the no-pr-activity No pull request activity label Jul 25, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
no-pr-activity No pull request activity
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants