-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 712
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fix events day-view #2087
fix events day-view #2087
Conversation
WalkthroughThe recent changes involve enhancing the EventCalendar component by switching from string comparisons of time to integer comparisons. This change aims to improve accuracy and consistency, specifically addressing the issue where newly created events were not visible in the Day view, even though they appeared in the monthly view. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)N/A Assessment against linked issues
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessWe have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team. Testing Your CodePlease make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:
The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (1)
- src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.tsx (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (1)
src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.tsx (1)
321-322
: LGTM! Verify the correctness of integer conversion.The changes convert the time comparison from string to integer, which should enhance accuracy.
However, ensure that the integer conversion is correct and does not introduce any edge cases.
Verification successful
Verification of integer conversion and comparison logic
The usage of
parseInt
to extract the hour part of the time string and compare it with the modulo ofindex
is correct. Ensure thatdatas.startTime
is always a valid string with at least two characters to avoid potential issues.
- Code snippet:
if ( parseInt(datas.startTime?.slice(0, 2) as string).toString() == (index % 24).toString() && datas.startDate == dayjs(currDate).format('YYYY-MM-DD') ) { return datas; }Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of integer conversion in time comparison. # Test: Search for the usage of the `parseInt` function. Expect: Proper usage without edge cases. rg --type js 'parseInt'Length of output: 23
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the correctness of integer conversion in time comparison within the specific file and lines. # Test: Search for the usage of the `parseInt` function within the specified file and include surrounding lines for context. rg --type js 'parseInt' -A 5 -B 5 src/components/EventCalendar/EventCalendar.tsxLength of output: 456
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #2087 +/- ##
========================================
Coverage 97.91% 97.91%
========================================
Files 231 231
Lines 6201 6201
Branches 1790 1783 -7
========================================
Hits 6072 6072
Misses 118 118
Partials 11 11 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
This pull request did not get any activity in the past 10 days and will be closed in 180 days if no update occurs. Please verify it has no conflicts with the develop branch and rebase if needed. Mention it now if you need help or give permission to other people to finish your work. |
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
bugfix
Issue Number:
Fixes #1913
Did you add tests for your changes?
No, not required
Snapshots/Videos:
After:
Before:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Not relevant
Summary
Events were not visible in day view due to incorrect conditional rendering in a filter function.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Other information
None
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit