fix: misplaced layout #2230
fix: misplaced layout #2230
Conversation
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@anuragnegi000 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 20 minutes and 47 seconds before requesting another review. How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. WalkthroughThe changes involve updates to localization files for multiple languages, modifications to routing paths for posts, and refinements in TypeScript types related to posts and comments within the application. New sections for posts have been added to the translation files, routing paths have been adjusted for clarity, and the data structures have been improved to enhance user interactions with posts and comments. Changes
Sequence Diagram(s)sequenceDiagram
participant User
participant OrganizationCard
participant App
participant PostsScreen
User->>OrganizationCard: Click on Posts Button
OrganizationCard->>App: Navigate to /user/posts/:orgId
App->>PostsScreen: Load Posts Content
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessWe have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team. Testing Your CodePlease make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:
The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (6)
- public/locales/en/translation.json (1 hunks)
- src/App.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/UserPortal/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/screens/UserPortal/Posts/Posts.tsx (5 hunks)
- src/screens/UserPortal/UserScreen/UserScreen.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/state/reducers/userRoutesReducer.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- public/locales/en/translation.json
Additional comments not posted (8)
src/state/reducers/userRoutesReducer.ts (1)
53-53: LGTM! But verify thecomp_idusage in the codebase.The change from
comp_id: 'organization'tocomp_id: 'posts'is straightforward and aligns with the PR objective. Ensure that all references tocomp_idare updated accordingly to avoid breaking changes.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the
comp_idusage:Verification successful
Change verified:
comp_idupdate to 'posts' is correctly implemented.The update to
comp_id: 'posts'inuserRoutesReducer.tsis isolated and does not affect other parts of the codebase. The change aligns with the intended modification and is safe to proceed.
src/state/reducers/userRoutesReducer.ts:comp_id: 'posts'is correctly used.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to `comp_id` are updated accordingly. # Test: Search for the `comp_id` usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new `comp_id`. rg --type python -A 5 $'comp_id'Length of output: 62
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to `comp_id: 'posts'` are updated accordingly in TypeScript files. # Test: Search for the `comp_id: 'posts'` usage. Expect: Occurrences of the new `comp_id`. rg --type ts -A 5 $'comp_id: \'posts\''Length of output: 521
src/screens/UserPortal/UserScreen/UserScreen.tsx (1)
16-16: LGTM! But verify themapusage in the codebase.The addition of
posts: 'posts'to themapobject is straightforward and aligns with the PR objective. Ensure that all references to themapobject are updated accordingly to avoid breaking changes.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the
mapusage:Verification successful
The addition of
posts: 'posts'to themapobject is isolated.The
mapobject is defined and used locally withinUserScreen.tsx, and there are no external references or imports related to it. The addition of thepostskey does not affect other parts of the codebase.
src/screens/UserPortal/UserScreen/UserScreen.tsx: Themapobject is defined and used locally.Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to the `map` object are updated accordingly. # Test: Search for the `map` usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new `map`. rg --type js -A 5 $'map'Length of output: 23
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to the `map` object in TypeScript files are updated accordingly. # Test: Search for the `map` usage specifically for the 'posts' key in TypeScript files. rg --type ts -A 5 'map.*posts'Length of output: 32
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to the `map` object in TypeScript files. # Test: Search for the `map` object usage in TypeScript files. rg --type ts -A 5 'map' # Additionally, search for any imports or definitions related to `map`. rg --type ts -A 5 'import.*map'Length of output: 99474
src/components/UserPortal/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.tsx (1)
196-196: LGTM! But verify thenavigateusage in the codebase.The change from
/user/organization/${props.id}to/user/posts/${props.id}is straightforward and aligns with the PR objective. Ensure that all references to thenavigatefunction are updated accordingly to avoid breaking changes.The code changes are approved.
Run the following script to verify the
navigateusage:Verification successful
Verification Successful: The
navigatefunction change is isolated toOrganizationCard.tsx.The change to the
navigatefunction inOrganizationCard.tsxis specific to this component and does not affect other parts of the codebase. The update aligns with the intended functionality without introducing any breaking changes.
- Location:
src/components/UserPortal/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.tsxScripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to the `navigate` function are updated accordingly. # Test: Search for the `navigate` usage. Expect: Only occurrences of the new `navigate`. rg --type js -A 5 $'navigate'Length of output: 28
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify all references to the `navigate` function are updated accordingly. # Test: Search for the `navigate` usage in TypeScript files. Expect: Only occurrences of the new `navigate`. rg --type ts -A 5 $'navigate'Length of output: 44782
src/App.tsx (1)
198-198: LGTM!The route change from
/user/organization/:orgIdto/user/posts/:orgIdis semantically accurate and reflects the content being accessed.The code changes are approved.
src/screens/UserPortal/Posts/Posts.tsx (4)
57-65: LGTM!The change in the
likedByproperty fromlikedBy: { id: string; }[];tolikedBy: { _id: string; }[];improves consistency with other ID properties in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
101-103: LGTM!The new
CommentLiketype improves type safety and clarity in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
105-116: LGTM!The new
Commenttype improves type safety and clarity in the codebase.The code changes are approved.
Line range hint
225-257: LGTM!The updated logic within the
homefunction enhances type safety and maintainability by using the newCommentandCommentLiketypes and explicitly typing theallLikesarray asInterfacePostLikes.The code changes are approved.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Outside diff range, codebase verification and nitpick comments (1)
src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.tsx (1)
64-64: Ensure proper handling of therolestate inLoginPage.tsx.The
rolestate is used in various conditional checks and rendering logic. Since it is initialized asundefined, ensure that it is set appropriately before any dependent logic is executed to avoid potential issues.
- Verify that the
handleRoleTogglefunction or other mechanisms set therolebefore its usage.- Consider adding default handling or checks to prevent errors when
roleisundefined.Analysis chain
Verify the component's behavior with the updated role state initialization.
The change removes the default role initialization, which may impact the component's behavior. Ensure that the role is explicitly defined where necessary to avoid unintended consequences.
Run the following script to verify the component's behavior:
Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the component's behavior with the updated role state initialization. # Test: Search for the role state usage. Expect: Proper handling of undefined role state. rg --type tsx -A 5 $'const [role, setRole] = useState<\'admin\' | \'user\'>()'Length of output: 115
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Verify the component's behavior with the updated role state initialization. # Test: Search for the role state usage in .tsx files. Expect: Proper handling of undefined role state. rg --glob '*.tsx' -A 5 $'const [role, setRole] = useState<\'admin\' | \'user\'>()'Length of output: 1121
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Description: Search for the usage of the role state variable within LoginPage.tsx to verify proper handling. # Test: Search for the usage of the role state variable in LoginPage.tsx. rg 'role' src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.tsx -A 5 -B 5Length of output: 2658
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (5)
- public/locales/fr/translation.json (1 hunks)
- public/locales/hi/translation.json (1 hunks)
- public/locales/sp/translation.json (1 hunks)
- public/locales/zh/translation.json (1 hunks)
- src/screens/LoginPage/LoginPage.tsx (1 hunks)
Additional comments not posted (4)
public/locales/zh/translation.json (1)
131-133: LGTM!The new entry for "posts" is correctly formatted and integrated into the existing JSON structure.
The code changes are approved.
public/locales/hi/translation.json (1)
131-133: LGTM!The addition of the "posts" section with the key-value pair "title": "पोस्ट्स" enhances the localization support and is correctly implemented.
The code changes are approved.
public/locales/fr/translation.json (1)
131-133: LGTM!The addition of the "posts" key with the title "Messages" is correctly formatted and enhances localization support.
The code changes are approved.
public/locales/sp/translation.json (1)
191-193: LGTM!The new entry for "posts" is added correctly in the translation JSON.
The code changes are approved.
|
Please fix the failing tests |
working on it |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (5)
- public/locales/en/translation.json (1 hunks)
- public/locales/fr/translation.json (1 hunks)
- public/locales/hi/translation.json (1 hunks)
- public/locales/sp/translation.json (1 hunks)
- public/locales/zh/translation.json (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (4)
- public/locales/en/translation.json
- public/locales/fr/translation.json
- public/locales/hi/translation.json
- public/locales/sp/translation.json
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- public/locales/zh/translation.json
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Files selected for processing (7)
- public/locales/en/translation.json (1 hunks)
- src/App.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/components/UserPortal/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/screens/UserPortal/Posts/Posts.tsx (5 hunks)
- src/screens/UserPortal/UserScreen/UserScreen.tsx (1 hunks)
- src/state/reducers/userRoutersReducer.test.ts (4 hunks)
- src/state/reducers/userRoutesReducer.ts (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (5)
- public/locales/en/translation.json
- src/App.tsx
- src/components/UserPortal/OrganizationCard/OrganizationCard.tsx
- src/screens/UserPortal/Posts/Posts.tsx
- src/screens/UserPortal/UserScreen/UserScreen.tsx
Additional comments not posted (5)
src/state/reducers/userRoutesReducer.ts (1)
53-53: LGTM!The change in the
comp_idproperty from'organization'to'posts'is semantically correct and accurately represents the 'Posts' component. This update enhances the clarity and correctness of component identification in the application's state management.src/state/reducers/userRoutersReducer.test.ts (4)
14-14: LGTM!The code change is approved.
29-29: LGTM!The code change is approved.
54-54: LGTM!The code change is approved.
69-69: LGTM!The code change is approved.
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
This fix the misplaced screen and title in user screen
Issue Number:
#2071
Fixes #
Did you add tests for your changes?
No, not required
Snapshots/Videos:
Before:-
After:-
after.mp4
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Summary
Previously, the screen layout had an issue where the title was misplaced, rendering inside the child container instead of the parent container. This PR addresses and fixes that layout issue, ensuring the title is correctly positioned within the parent container.
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Bug Fixes
Refactor
Chores