-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 714
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
fixed manage button #2463
fixed manage button #2463
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on modifying the CSS for the Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related PRs
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessWe have these basic policies to make the approval process smoother for our volunteer team. Testing Your CodePlease make sure your code passes all tests. Our test code coverage system will fail if these conditions occur:
The process helps maintain the overall reliability of the code base and is a prerequisite for getting your PR approved. Assigned reviewers regularly review the PR queue and tend to focus on PRs that are passing. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
src/components/OrgListCard/OrgListCard.module.css (3)
4-4
: Height adjustment fixes the overlap but consider a more flexible solution.While increasing the height resolves the immediate issue, consider using
min-height
instead of a fixed height to better accommodate varying content lengths:- height: calc(130px + 2rem); + min-height: calc(130px + 2rem);This would prevent potential overflow issues with longer content while maintaining the minimum space needed for the manage button.
Line range hint
15-33
: Consider consolidating duplicate selectors.There are multiple identical
.orgImgContainer
selectors that could be combined to improve maintainability:.orgCard .innerContainer .orgImgContainer { display: flex; justify-content: center; align-items: center; position: relative; overflow: hidden; border-radius: 4px; -} - -.orgCard .innerContainer .orgImgContainer { width: 125px; height: 120px; object-fit: contain; -} - -.orgCard .innerContainer .orgImgContainer { - width: 125px; - height: 120px; background-color: var(--bs-gray-200); }
Fixed height might cause content overflow issues
Based on the test file and usage patterns found, the fixed height constraint could indeed cause issues:
- The test data shows varying content lengths:
- Organization names (e.g., "Dogs Care")
- Full addresses with multiple lines (line1, line2, city, state)
- Variable number of admins and members
- The component is used in OrgList screen for both regular and admin views
- The component includes additional elements like a manage button and flask icon that need to fit
Recommendations:
- Consider using
min-height
instead of fixedheight
- Allow content to expand naturally with
height: auto
- If a consistent height is required, implement text truncation with ellipsis
🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
1-9
: Verify the layout across different scenarios.The fixed height solution might need verification in the following scenarios:
- Long organization names or descriptions
- Different viewport widths
- Different font sizes (browser zoom)
- With and without address information
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for components using OrgListCard to understand usage patterns rg -l "OrgListCard" --type tsx --type jsx # Look for any existing test files fd -e test.tsx -e test.jsx -e spec.tsx -e spec.jsx OrgListCard # Check for any existing snapshot tests rg "toMatchSnapshot" -A 5 -B 5Length of output: 213
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Search for components using OrgListCard with correct file extensions rg -l "OrgListCard" -g "*.tsx" -g "*.jsx" # Check the test file content cat src/components/OrgListCard/OrgListCard.test.tsx # Look for props interface or type definition rg -A 5 "interface.*OrgListCard" -g "*.ts*" rg -A 5 "type.*OrgListCard" -g "*.ts*" # Search for actual usage to understand data patterns rg "OrgListCard" -A 5 -B 5 -g "*.tsx" -g "*.jsx"Length of output: 16031
|
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
[bug]: manage button overlap with address
Issue Number:
Fixes #2431
Did you add tests for your changes?
no
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Summary
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
changing the height of the div and now the manage button does not overlap with address
Have you read the contributing guide?
Summary by CodeRabbit