fix failing workflow of TS compilation #2472
Conversation
WalkthroughThe changes in this pull request focus on updating the GitHub Actions workflow configuration in the Changes
Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Warning Rate limit exceeded@varshith257 has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 22 minutes and 39 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📜 Recent review detailsConfiguration used: .coderabbit.yaml 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 1
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (3)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml (3)
Line range hint
215-219: TypeScript compilation changes look good with a minor considerationThe changes improve type safety by checking all files and add proper extension filtering. However, compiling all files instead of just changed ones might impact workflow performance on repositories with many TypeScript files.
Consider adding a conditional to only run full compilation on specific paths or when certain core files change, using changed-files action's
filesparameter for filtering.🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.3)
214-214: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2043:warning:1:13: This loop will only ever run once. Bad quoting or missing glob/expansion?
(shellcheck)
Line range hint
1-397: Overall workflow structure is robust but needs attentionThe workflow provides comprehensive PR checks including code quality, tests, and Docker builds. While the TypeScript compilation changes improve type safety, there are two items that need attention:
- The critical issue with the changed-files step reference needs to be fixed
- The target branch requirement needs to be consistently documented
Consider adding workflow documentation in the
.github/workflows/README.mdfile to explain the purpose of each job and their dependencies. This would help contributors understand the CI process better.🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.3)
61-61: property "changed_files" is not defined in object type {changed-files: {conclusion: string; outcome: string; outputs: {string => string}}}
(expression)
62-62: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:12: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
Branch enforcement mismatch between documentation and workflow configuration
There is a clear discrepancy between the documentation and the workflow configuration:
- PR_GUIDELINES.md explicitly states PRs should target the
developbranch- The workflow in
.github/workflows/pull-request.ymlenforcesdevelop-postgresas the target branchThis inconsistency needs to be resolved by either:
- Updating PR_GUIDELINES.md to reflect the correct target branch (
develop-postgres)- Or modifying the workflow to enforce the documented target branch (
develop)🔗 Analysis chain
Line range hint
391-397: Verify target branch requirement documentationThe workflow enforces
develop-postgresas the target branch, but the PR objectives mention submissions should be against thedevelopbranch. This discrepancy could confuse contributors.
Let me verify the workflow configuration to confirm the target branch enforcement.
Let me check if there are any other workflow files or configuration that might enforce the target branch.
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check if documentation consistently specifies the correct target branch echo "Checking documentation for branch references..." rg -i "target.*branch|branch.*target|submit.*branch|branch.*submit" PR_GUIDELINES.md README.md CONTRIBUTING.mdLength of output: 685
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check workflow configuration for branch enforcement echo "Checking workflow configuration..." cat .github/workflows/pull-request.yml | grep -A 5 -B 5 "branches:"Length of output: 309
Script:
#!/bin/bash # Check all workflow files and configuration for branch enforcement echo "Listing all workflow files..." fd . .github/workflows/ echo -e "\nChecking for branch enforcement in all workflow files..." rg -i "develop-postgres" .github/workflows/ echo -e "\nChecking repository settings file if exists..." fd settings.yml .github/Length of output: 1117
🧰 Tools
🪛 actionlint (1.7.3)
61-61: property "changed_files" is not defined in object type {changed-files: {conclusion: string; outcome: string; outputs: {string => string}}}
(expression)
62-62: shellcheck reported issue in this script: SC2086:info:1:12: Double quote to prevent globbing and word splitting
(shellcheck)
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml(2 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🪛 actionlint (1.7.3)
.github/workflows/pull-request.yml
61-61: property "changed_files" is not defined in object type {changed-files: {conclusion: string; outcome: string; outputs: {string => string}}}
(expression)
varshith257
added
the
ignore-sensitive-files-pr
varshith257
changed the title
Codecov ReportAll modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop-postgres #2472 +/- ##
=================================================
Coverage 98.26% 98.26%
=================================================
Files 297 297
Lines 8638 8638
Branches 2486 2486
=================================================
Hits 8488 8488
Misses 139 139
Partials 11 11 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
varshith257
requested review from
pranshugupta54,
GlenDsza,
AVtheking,
Doraemon012,
gautam-divyanshu and
Atharva-Kanherkar
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Issue Number:
Fixes #
Did you add tests for your changes?
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Summary
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Summary by CodeRabbit