Refactor: src/screens/PageNotFound/PageNotFound.test.tsx from jest to vitest (Fixes #2568) #2592
Conversation
geNotFound.test.tsx from jest to vitest (Issue PalisadoesFoundation#2568)
WalkthroughThe pull request refactors the test file Changes
Assessment against linked issues
Possibly related issues
Possibly related PRs
Suggested labels
Suggested reviewers
Poem
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? 🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
Documentation and Community
|
Our Pull Request Approval ProcessThanks for contributing! Testing Your CodeRemember, your PRs won't be reviewed until these criteria are met:
Our policies make our code better. ReviewersDo not assign reviewers. Our Queue Monitors will review your PR and assign them.
Reviewing Your CodeYour reviewer(s) will have the following roles:
CONTRIBUTING.mdRead our CONTRIBUTING.md file. Most importantly:
Other
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Outside diff range and nitpick comments (4)
src/screens/PageNotFound/PageNotFound.spec.tsx (4)
11-11: LGTM! Consider importing additional Vitest utilitiesThe Vitest imports look good. However, consider importing additional useful Vitest utilities like
beforeEach,afterEach, orvifor mocking if needed in future test cases.-import { describe, test, expect } from 'vitest'; +import { describe, test, expect, beforeEach, afterEach, vi } from 'vitest';
Line range hint
15-32: Consider adding cleanup between testsThe test structure looks good, but it's important to ensure proper cleanup between tests, especially when dealing with rendered components.
Add cleanup in a beforeEach/afterEach block:
+import { cleanup } from '@testing-library/react'; + describe('Testing Page not found component', () => { + afterEach(() => { + cleanup(); + }); + test('Component should be rendered properly for User', () => {
Line range hint
34-59: Ensure localStorage cleanup after admin role testThe test correctly sets up the admin context, but we should clean up the localStorage after the test to prevent affecting other tests.
Add cleanup for localStorage:
describe('Testing Page not found component', () => { + afterEach(() => { + cleanup(); + localStorage.clear(); + }); test('Component should be rendered properly for ADMIN or SUPERADMIN', () => {
42-42: Remove unnecessary empty lineThe empty line between the localStorage setup and render call is not needed.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (1)
package-lock.jsonis excluded by!**/package-lock.json
📒 Files selected for processing (1)
src/screens/PageNotFound/PageNotFound.spec.tsx(2 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
src/screens/PageNotFound/PageNotFound.spec.tsx (1)
Line range hint 1-59: Verify test coverage and migration completeness
The migration to Vitest appears complete, but let's verify:
- All Jest-specific functions have been replaced
- Test coverage remains at 100%
✅ Verification successful
Migration to Vitest is complete and properly implemented
The verification shows:
- All test assertions use Vitest's
expectimported directly from 'vitest' - No Jest-specific functions or patterns remain in the test file
- Test coverage appears comprehensive with cases for both user roles
- Both Vitest and Jest config files exist in the project, suggesting an ongoing migration process, but this specific file is fully migrated
🏁 Scripts executed
The following scripts were executed for the analysis:
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check for any remaining Jest dependencies and verify test coverage
# Check for any remaining Jest-specific code
rg -i "jest\." src/screens/PageNotFound/PageNotFound.spec.tsx
rg -i "jest" src/screens/PageNotFound/PageNotFound.spec.tsx
# Look for common Jest-specific patterns that might need migration
rg -i "beforeAll|afterAll|beforeEach|afterEach" src/screens/PageNotFound/PageNotFound.spec.tsx
Length of output: 220
Script:
#!/bin/bash
# Let's verify test coverage and migration completeness with a broader search
# Check for any test-related imports and assertions
rg -A 1 "import.*test|expect|assert|mock|spy" src/screens/PageNotFound/PageNotFound.spec.tsx
# Check test coverage report if available
fd -g "coverage*" -t f
# Look for any potential test configuration files
fd -g "vitest.config*"
fd -g "jest.config*"
# Check if there are any other test files in the same directory that might need migration
fd -g "*.spec.*" -g "*.test.*" src/screens/PageNotFound/
Length of output: 1050
palisadoes
changed the title
|
This pull request did not get any activity in the past 10 days and will be closed in 180 days if no update occurs. Please verify it has no conflicts with the develop branch and rebase if needed. Mention it now if you need help or give permission to other people to finish your work. |
|
Closing as abandoned |
geNotFound.test.tsx from jest to vitest (Issue #2568)
What kind of change does this PR introduce?
Refactoring
Issue Number:
Fixes #2568
Did you add tests for your changes?
Yes
Snapshots/Videos:
If relevant, did you update the documentation?
Not Required
Summary
Updated src/screens/PageNotFound/PageNotFound.test.tsx from jest to vitest
Does this PR introduce a breaking change?
No
Other information
Have you read the contributing guide?
Yes
Summary by CodeRabbit
PageNotFoundcomponent to verify rendering for different user roles: "User" and "ADMIN or SUPERADMIN".